BIV vs KHYB

Vanguard Intermediate-Term Bond ETF against KraneShares Asia Pacific High Income USD Bond ETF: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Fee gap
66 bp
BIV is cheaper
1-year return gap
2.7 pts
KHYB is ahead
Larger fund
BIV
$28.1B

Side by side

BIVKHYB
FundVanguard Intermediate-Term Bond ETFKraneShares Asia Pacific High Income USD Bond ETF
IssuerVanguardKraneShares
CategoryCore BondCore Bond
Expense ratio0.03%0.69%
Assets$28.1B$15M
Average daily dollar volume$154M$70K
ListedApr 3, 2007Jun 26, 2018
FrenzyCap score9922
1-month return−1.7%−1.5%
3-month return−3.7%−1.7%
Year to date−6.4%−3.5%
1-year return−6.5%−3.8%
30-day volatility5.1%3.8%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−8.2%−5.4%
Trailing 12-month yield4.52%8.69%
Holdings2,35769
Top 10 weight20.9%20.7%
Look-through P/E——
Holdings vs fair value——
Holdings above 200-day average——
Net flow, latest 3 reported months+$778M thru Jun 2026$0 thru Jun 2026
30-day implied volatility5.8%51.1%
Holdings as ofas of Jun 30, 2026SEC filingas of Jun 30, 2026SEC filing

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

More: full overlap table · BIV holdings · KHYB holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.