BOND vs IRVH

PIMCO Active Bond Exchange-Traded Fund against Global X Interest Rate Volatility & Inflation Hedge ETF: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Overlap by weight
0%
0 shared positions
Fee gap
9 bp
IRVH is cheaper
1-year return gap
5.2 pts
BOND is ahead
Larger fund
BOND
$8.5B

Side by side

BONDIRVH
FundPIMCO Active Bond Exchange-Traded FundGlobal X Interest Rate Volatility & Inflation Hedge ETF
IssuerPIMCOGlobal X
CategoryMultisector BondMultisector Bond
Expense ratio0.54%0.45%
Assets$8.5B$1.1M
Average daily dollar volume$90M$5K
ListedFeb 29, 2012Jul 5, 2022
FrenzyCap score7110
1-month return−2.3%−1.9%
3-month return−4.4%−3.9%
Year to date−6.6%−9.8%
1-year return−6.7%−11.9%
30-day volatility5.8%4.7%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−8.7%−13.1%
Trailing 12-month yield5.46%5.96%
Holdings2,0122
Top 10 weight30.5%99.3%
Look-through P/E——
Holdings vs fair value——
Holdings above 200-day average——
Net flow, latest 3 reported months+$584M thru Jun 2026$0 thru May 2026
30-day implied volatility6.1%44.0%
Holdings as ofas of Jun 30, 2026SEC filingas of Oct 9, 2026issuer data

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

Largest shared holdings

0% of BOND · 0% of IRVH

No holdings in common.

Sector mix of the stock holdings

No sector breakdown: these funds hold few classified stocks.

More: full overlap table · BOND holdings · IRVH holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.