BUFR vs BUFT

FT Vest Laddered Buffer ETF against FT Vest Buffered Allocation Defensive ETF: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Overlap by weight
8%
1 shared positions
Fee gap
26 bp
BUFR is cheaper
1-year return gap
3.5 pts
BUFR is ahead
Larger fund
BUFR
$10.9B

Side by side

BUFRBUFT
FundFT Vest Laddered Buffer ETFFT Vest Buffered Allocation Defensive ETF
IssuerFT VestFT Vest
CategoryBufferBuffer
Expense ratio0.95%1.21%
Assets$10.9B$163M
Average daily dollar volume$47M$499K
ListedAug 10, 2020Oct 26, 2021
FrenzyCap score4917
1-month return+2.1%+0.8%
3-month return+3.5%+2.2%
Year to date+10.7%+7.8%
1-year return+13.2%+9.7%
30-day volatility5.2%2.1%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−4.6%−2.0%
Trailing 12-month yield——
Holdings138
Top 10 weight83.3%100.0%
Look-through P/E——
Holdings vs fair value——
Holdings above 200-day average——
Net flow, latest 3 reported months+$454M thru May 2026−$1.3M thru May 2026
30-day implied volatility——
Holdings as ofas of May 31, 2026SEC filingas of May 31, 2026SEC filing

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

Largest shared holdings

8% of BUFR · 11% of BUFT
HoldingBUFRBUFT
FJUN8.27%11.34%

Sector mix of the stock holdings

No sector breakdown: these funds hold few classified stocks.

More: full overlap table · BUFR holdings · BUFT holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.