BUFR vs RB

FT Vest Laddered Buffer ETF against ProShares Russell 2000 Dynamic Buffer ETF: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Overlap by weight
0%
0 shared positions
Fee gap
37 bp
RB is cheaper
1-year return gap
1.6 pts
BUFR is ahead
Larger fund
BUFR
$10.9B

Side by side

BUFRRB
FundFT Vest Laddered Buffer ETFProShares Russell 2000 Dynamic Buffer ETF
IssuerFT VestProShares
CategoryBufferBuffer
Expense ratio0.95%0.58%
Assets$10.9B$1.2M
Average daily dollar volume$47M$8K
ListedAug 10, 2020Jun 24, 2025
FrenzyCap score4927
1-month return+2.1%−1.1%
3-month return+3.5%−1.5%
Year to date+10.7%+5.9%
1-year return+13.2%+11.6%
30-day volatility5.2%3.7%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−4.6%−2.1%
Trailing 12-month yield—2.32%
Holdings131,969
Top 10 weight83.3%57.5%
Look-through P/E—803.4
Holdings vs fair value—+14.9%
Holdings above 200-day average—54%
Net flow, latest 3 reported months+$454M thru May 2026−$13K thru May 2026
30-day implied volatility——
Holdings as ofas of May 31, 2026SEC filingas of Oct 9, 2026issuer data

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

Largest shared holdings

0% of BUFR · 0% of RB

No holdings in common.

Sector mix of the stock holdings

SectorBUFRRBGap
Health Care0.0%8.4%−8.4%
Financials0.0%8.0%−8.0%
Industrials0.0%7.0%−7.0%
Technology0.0%5.7%−5.7%
Consumer Discretionary0.0%4.1%−4.1%
Real Estate0.0%2.7%−2.7%
Materials0.0%2.5%−2.5%
Energy0.0%1.8%−1.8%
Utilities0.0%1.6%−1.6%
Communication Services0.0%0.8%−0.8%
Consumer Staples0.0%0.6%−0.6%
Other0.0%0.0%−0.0%

More: full overlap table · BUFR holdings · RB holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.