CAM vs GMNY

AB California Intermediate Municipal ETF against Goldman Sachs Dynamic New York Municipal Income ETF: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Fee gap
3 bp
CAM is cheaper
1-year return gap
0.4 pts
CAM is ahead
Larger fund
CAM
$1.2B

Side by side

CAMGMNY
FundAB California Intermediate Municipal ETFGoldman Sachs Dynamic New York Municipal Income ETF
IssuerAllianceBernsteinGoldman Sachs
CategoryState MuniState Muni
Expense ratio0.27%0.30%
Assets$1.2B$48M
Average daily dollar volume$7.0M$1000K
ListedAug 6, 1990Jul 23, 2024
FrenzyCap score6744
1-month return−1.3%−1.6%
3-month return−3.5%−4.8%
Year to date−3.8%−4.5%
1-year return−3.6%−4.0%
30-day volatility4.1%5.5%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−5.9%−6.7%
Trailing 12-month yield3.35%3.55%
Holdings430194
Top 10 weight15.3%12.4%
Look-through P/E——
Holdings vs fair value——
Holdings above 200-day average——
Net flow, latest 3 reported months+$46M thru May 2026+$6.2M thru May 2026
30-day implied volatility——
Holdings as ofas of May 31, 2026SEC filingas of May 31, 2026SEC filing

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

More: full overlap table · CAM holdings · GMNY holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.