CDPI vs QYLD
Columbia High Dividend Premium Income ETF against Global X Funds Global X NASDAQ-100 Covered Call ETF: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.
Fee gap
15 bp
CDPI is cheaper
1-year return gap
—
Larger fund
QYLD
$8.5B
Side by side
| CDPI | QYLD | |
|---|---|---|
| Fund | Columbia High Dividend Premium Income ETF | Global X Funds Global X NASDAQ-100 Covered Call ETF |
| Issuer | Columbia | Global X |
| Category | Covered Call | Covered Call |
| Expense ratio | 0.45% | 0.60% |
| Assets | — | $8.5B |
| Average daily dollar volume | $5K | $69M |
| Listed | Jul 14, 2026 | Dec 11, 2013 |
| FrenzyCap score | 47 | 82 |
| 1-month return | −2.4% | +2.5% |
| 3-month return | — | +3.0% |
| Year to date | — | +5.8% |
| 1-year return | — | +8.9% |
| 30-day volatility | 7.4% | 5.6% |
| Worst drawdown, 1 year | −4.5% | −7.0% |
| Trailing 12-month yield | 0.86% | 11.40% |
| Holdings | — | 104 |
| Top 10 weight | — | 49.2% |
| Look-through P/E | — | 35.0 |
| Holdings vs fair value | — | −4.8% |
| Holdings above 200-day average | — | 79% |
| Net flow, latest 3 reported months | — | −$250M thru Jul 2026 |
| 30-day implied volatility | — | 15.8% |
| Holdings as of | as of Oct 9, 2026issuer data |
Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.
More: full overlap table · CDPI holdings · QYLD holdings
Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.