CEFS vs MEMA

Saba Opportunistically Hedged Closed-End Funds ETF against Man Active Emerging Markets Alternative ETF: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Fee gap
—
same fee
1-year return gap
—
Larger fund
CEFS
$432M

Side by side

CEFSMEMA
FundSaba Opportunistically Hedged Closed-End Funds ETFMan Active Emerging Markets Alternative ETF
IssuerSabaMan
CategoryMulti-StrategyMulti-Strategy
Expense ratio2.61%—
Assets$432M—
Average daily dollar volume$2.0M$255K
ListedMar 20, 2017Dec 16, 2025
FrenzyCap score36—
1-month return−2.0%−1.0%
3-month return−2.9%+5.3%
Year to date+6.6%+21.6%
1-year return+7.0%—
30-day volatility10.5%22.3%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−6.3%−15.0%
Trailing 12-month yield7.79%0.28%
Holdings74—
Top 10 weight50.8%—
Look-through P/E——
Holdings vs fair value——
Holdings above 200-day average——
Net flow, latest 3 reported months+$2.8M thru May 2026—
30-day implied volatility——
Holdings as ofas of May 31, 2026SEC filing

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

More: full overlap table · CEFS holdings · MEMA holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.