CGBL vs MVPL

Capital Group Core Balanced ETF against Miller Value Partners Leverage ETF: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Overlap by weight
0%
0 shared positions
Fee gap
139 bp
CGBL is cheaper
1-year return gap
17.1 pts
MVPL is ahead
Larger fund
CGBL
$7.7B

Side by side

CGBLMVPL
FundCapital Group Core Balanced ETFMiller Value Partners Leverage ETF
IssuerCapital GroupMiller
CategoryAllocationAllocation
Expense ratio0.33%1.72%
Assets$7.7B$33M
Average daily dollar volume$49M$133K
ListedSep 26, 2023Feb 27, 2024
FrenzyCap score756
1-month return−0.8%+5.4%
3-month return−0.5%+6.6%
Year to date+5.2%+25.0%
1-year return+6.2%+23.3%
30-day volatility9.0%20.4%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−7.9%−13.7%
Trailing 12-month yield1.94%0.88%
Holdings772
Top 10 weight59.3%99.8%
Look-through P/E27.1—
Holdings vs fair value+0.9%—
Holdings above 200-day average64%—
Net flow, latest 3 reported months+$1.0B thru Jun 2026$0 thru Jun 2026
30-day implied volatility——
Holdings as ofas of Jun 30, 2026SEC filingas of Jun 30, 2026SEC filing

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

Largest shared holdings

0% of CGBL · 0% of MVPL

No holdings in common.

Sector mix of the stock holdings

SectorCGBLMVPLGap
Technology23.2%0.0%+23.2%
Industrials11.1%0.0%+11.1%
Financials5.6%0.0%+5.6%
Health Care4.4%0.0%+4.4%
Materials3.4%0.0%+3.4%
Consumer Staples2.6%0.0%+2.6%
Consumer Discretionary2.4%0.0%+2.4%
Utilities1.7%0.0%+1.7%
Energy1.0%0.0%+1.0%
Communication Services0.7%0.0%+0.7%

More: full overlap table · CGBL holdings · MVPL holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.