CGRO vs IPOS

CoreValues Alpha Greater China Growth ETF against Renaissance International IPO ETF: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Overlap by weight
6%
2 shared positions
Fee gap
9 bp
IPOS is cheaper
1-year return gap
65.7 pts
IPOS is ahead
Larger fund
IPOS
$10M

Side by side

CGROIPOS
FundCoreValues Alpha Greater China Growth ETFRenaissance International IPO ETF
IssuerCoreValuesRenaissance
CategorySingle CountryIPOs & Special Situations
Expense ratio0.89%0.80%
Assets$1.6M$10M
Average daily dollar volume$19K$35K
ListedOct 2, 2023Oct 6, 2014
FrenzyCap score1211
1-month return−22.1%−7.9%
3-month return−23.3%−10.7%
Year to date−38.8%+24.2%
1-year return−48.1%+17.6%
30-day volatility63.0%20.1%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−49.8%−21.0%
Trailing 12-month yield29.94%0.69%
Holdings3249
Top 10 weight54.5%63.8%
Look-through P/E——
Holdings vs fair value——
Holdings above 200-day average——
Net flow, latest 3 reported months+$589K thru Jun 2026+$1.1M thru Jun 2026
30-day implied volatility—36.9%
Holdings as ofas of Jun 30, 2026SEC filingas of Jun 30, 2026SEC filing

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

Largest shared holdings

7% of CGRO · 6% of IPOS
HoldingCGROIPOS
J&T Global Express Ltd4.01%3.50%
Horizon Robotics2.98%2.67%

Sector mix of the stock holdings

SectorCGROIPOSGap
Industrials16.3%0.0%+16.3%
Consumer Discretionary10.8%0.0%+10.8%
Technology3.2%0.0%+3.2%
Financials1.6%0.0%+1.6%
Real Estate1.1%0.0%+1.1%

More: full overlap table · CGRO holdings · IPOS holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.