DDV vs GMOD

Defined Duration 5 ETF against GMO Dynamic Allocation ETF: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Overlap by weight
12%
2 shared positions
Fee gap
25 bp
DDV is cheaper
1-year return gap
—
Larger fund
GMOD
$39M

Side by side

DDVGMOD
FundDefined Duration 5 ETFGMO Dynamic Allocation ETF
IssuerDefinedGMO
CategoryMultisector BondTactical & Rotation
Expense ratio0.25%0.50%
Assets$14M$39M
Average daily dollar volume$117K$299K
ListedNov 12, 2025Oct 13, 2025
FrenzyCap score2035
1-month return−1.1%−1.0%
3-month return−1.1%+0.7%
Year to date−0.1%+7.3%
1-year return——
30-day volatility3.8%6.9%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−2.6%−6.5%
Trailing 12-month yield2.42%1.36%
Holdings721
Top 10 weight62.1%76.1%
Look-through P/E——
Holdings vs fair value——
Holdings above 200-day average——
Net flow, latest 3 reported months+$4.3M thru Jul 2026+$3.3M thru May 2026
30-day implied volatility——
Holdings as ofas of Apr 30, 2026SEC filingas of May 31, 2026SEC filing

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

Largest shared holdings

48% of DDV · 12% of GMOD
HoldingDDVGMOD
VGIT20.45%7.47%
VGSH27.51%4.66%

Sector mix of the stock holdings

No sector breakdown: these funds hold few classified stocks.

More: full overlap table · DDV holdings · GMOD holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.