DDV vs TBFC

Defined Duration 5 ETF against The Brinsmere Fund Conservative ETF: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Overlap by weight
15%
1 shared positions
Fee gap
19 bp
DDV is cheaper
1-year return gap
—
Larger fund
TBFC
$358M

Side by side

DDVTBFC
FundDefined Duration 5 ETFThe Brinsmere Fund Conservative ETF
IssuerDefinedThe Brinsmere
CategoryMultisector BondAllocation
Expense ratio0.25%0.44%
Assets$14M$358M
Average daily dollar volume$117K$130K
ListedNov 12, 2025Jan 12, 2024
FrenzyCap score2044
1-month return−1.1%−1.0%
3-month return−1.1%−0.8%
Year to date−0.1%+2.6%
1-year return—+2.8%
30-day volatility3.8%6.2%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−2.6%−5.7%
Trailing 12-month yield2.42%3.15%
Holdings725
Top 10 weight62.1%71.4%
Look-through P/E——
Holdings vs fair value——
Holdings above 200-day average——
Net flow, latest 3 reported months+$4.3M thru Jul 2026+$3.2M thru Jun 2026
30-day implied volatility——
Holdings as ofas of Apr 30, 2026SEC filingas of Jun 30, 2026SEC filing

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

Largest shared holdings

20% of DDV · 15% of TBFC
HoldingDDVTBFC
VGIT20.45%14.52%

Sector mix of the stock holdings

No sector breakdown: these funds hold few classified stocks.

More: full overlap table · DDV holdings · TBFC holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.