DQJN vs VSDA

FT Vest Nasdaq-100 Dual Directional Buffer ETF - June against VictoryShares Dividend Accelerator ETF: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Fee gap
55 bp
VSDA is cheaper
1-year return gap
—
Larger fund
VSDA
$210M

Side by side

DQJNVSDA
FundFT Vest Nasdaq-100 Dual Directional Buffer ETF - JuneVictoryShares Dividend Accelerator ETF
IssuerFT VestVictoryShares
CategoryAccelerated & BarrierAccelerated & Barrier
Expense ratio0.90%0.35%
Assets—$210M
Average daily dollar volume$101K$610K
ListedJun 18, 2026Apr 18, 2017
FrenzyCap score465
1-month return+3.9%−1.7%
3-month return+6.0%−2.4%
Year to date—+7.7%
1-year return—+6.1%
30-day volatility9.1%9.3%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−5.8%−9.7%
Trailing 12-month yield—2.56%
Holdings—80
Top 10 weight—30.6%
Look-through P/E—18.7
Holdings vs fair value—+6.9%
Holdings above 200-day average—51%
Net flow, latest 3 reported months—+$8.3M thru Jun 2026
30-day implied volatility—36.6%
Holdings as ofas of Jun 30, 2026SEC filing

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

More: full overlap table · DQJN holdings · VSDA holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.