DRGN vs KBA

Themes China Generative Artificial Intelligence ETF against KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Index ETF: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Overlap by weight
10%
2 shared positions
Fee gap
17 bp
DRGN is cheaper
1-year return gap
19.2 pts
KBA is ahead
Larger fund
KBA
$117M

Side by side

DRGNKBA
FundThemes China Generative Artificial Intelligence ETFKraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Index ETF
IssuerThemesKraneShares
CategorySingle CountrySingle Country
Expense ratio0.39%0.56%
Assets$27M$117M
Average daily dollar volume$238K$1.2M
ListedJul 14, 2025Mar 4, 2014
FrenzyCap score3644
1-month return−4.9%−4.7%
3-month return−15.1%−6.3%
Year to date−3.8%−0.1%
1-year return−16.4%+2.7%
30-day volatility22.4%12.3%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−25.6%−13.9%
Trailing 12-month yield1.26%1.57%
Holdings2452
Top 10 weight62.3%49.1%
Look-through P/E——
Holdings vs fair value——
Holdings above 200-day average——
Net flow, latest 3 reported months−$552K thru Jun 2026−$40M thru Jun 2026
30-day implied volatility31.9%52.6%
Holdings as ofas of Jun 30, 2026SEC filingas of Jun 30, 2026SEC filing

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

Largest shared holdings

16% of DRGN · 10% of KBA
HoldingDRGNKBA
Cambricon Technologies Corp Lt7.43%5.13%
Hygon Information Technology C8.13%4.41%

Sector mix of the stock holdings

SectorDRGNKBAGap
Technology6.7%0.0%+6.7%

More: full overlap table · DRGN holdings · KBA holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.