EEMO vs KMCA

Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Momentum ETF against PLUS Korea Manufacturing Core Alliance Index ETF: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Overlap by weight
11%
3 shared positions
Fee gap
36 bp
EEMO is cheaper
1-year return gap
—
Larger fund
EEMO
$26M

Side by side

EEMOKMCA
FundInvesco S&P Emerging Markets Momentum ETFPLUS Korea Manufacturing Core Alliance Index ETF
IssuerInvescoPLUS
CategoryEmerging MarketsSingle Country
Expense ratio0.29%0.65%
Assets$26M$2.6M
Average daily dollar volume$1.9M$46K
ListedFeb 24, 2012May 6, 2026
FrenzyCap score5317
1-month return+0.6%−0.7%
3-month return+7.2%+11.0%
Year to date+28.9%—
1-year return+24.9%—
30-day volatility31.5%40.2%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−27.4%−39.3%
Trailing 12-month yield1.71%—
Holdings23236
Top 10 weight48.1%59.7%
Look-through P/E——
Holdings vs fair value——
Holdings above 200-day average——
Net flow, latest 3 reported months+$13M thru Jul 2026+$2.4M thru May 2026
30-day implied volatility——
Holdings as ofas of Oct 8, 2026issuer dataas of May 31, 2026SEC filing

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

Largest shared holdings

11% of EEMO · 25% of KMCA
HoldingEEMOKMCA
Samsung Electronics Co Ltd8.75%7.86%
Samsung Electro-Mechanics Co Ltd2.21%14.88%
Hyundai Motor Co0.43%2.70%

Sector mix of the stock holdings

SectorEEMOKMCAGap
Industrials0.3%0.6%−0.3%
Financials0.5%0.0%+0.5%
Materials0.4%0.0%+0.4%
Technology0.3%0.0%+0.3%
Communication Services0.3%0.0%+0.3%
Utilities0.3%0.0%+0.3%
Consumer Discretionary0.1%0.0%+0.1%

More: full overlap table · EEMO holdings · KMCA holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.