EFA vs MIVL
iShares MSCI EAFE ETF against MFS Active International Value ETF: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.
Fee gap
25 bp
EFA is cheaper
1-year return gap
—
Larger fund
EFA
$76.5B
Side by side
| EFA | MIVL | |
|---|---|---|
| Fund | iShares MSCI EAFE ETF | MFS Active International Value ETF |
| Issuer | iShares | MFS |
| Category | Developed ex-US | Developed ex-US |
| Expense ratio | 0.32% | 0.57% |
| Assets | $76.5B | — |
| Average daily dollar volume | $1.4B | $7K |
| Listed | Aug 14, 2001 | Jun 4, 2026 |
| FrenzyCap score | 91 | 25 |
| 1-month return | −2.1% | −3.5% |
| 3-month return | +0.1% | −0.6% |
| Year to date | +7.7% | — |
| 1-year return | +9.1% | — |
| 30-day volatility | 12.5% | 11.0% |
| Worst drawdown, 1 year | −11.4% | −7.3% |
| Trailing 12-month yield | 3.25% | — |
| Holdings | 680 | — |
| Top 10 weight | 14.2% | — |
| Look-through P/E | — | — |
| Holdings vs fair value | — | — |
| Holdings above 200-day average | — | — |
| Net flow, latest 3 reported months | +$121M thru Jul 2026 | — |
| 30-day implied volatility | 14.1% | — |
| Holdings as of | as of Oct 8, 2026issuer data |
Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.
More: full overlap table · EFA holdings · MIVL holdings
Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.