EMIF vs IGF
iShares Emerging Markets Infrastructure ETF against iShares Global Infrastructure ETF: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.
Overlap by weight
12%
21 shared positions
Fee gap
23 bp
IGF is cheaper
1-year return gap
7.8 pts
EMIF is ahead
Larger fund
IGF
$10.4B
Side by side
| EMIF | IGF | |
|---|---|---|
| Fund | iShares Emerging Markets Infrastructure ETF | iShares Global Infrastructure ETF |
| Issuer | iShares | iShares |
| Category | Infrastructure | Infrastructure |
| Expense ratio | 0.60% | 0.37% |
| Assets | $14M | $10.4B |
| Average daily dollar volume | $56K | $59M |
| Listed | Jun 16, 2009 | Dec 10, 2007 |
| FrenzyCap score | 24 | 86 |
| 1-month return | +3.7% | −2.0% |
| 3-month return | +6.7% | −6.4% |
| Year to date | +4.4% | +2.3% |
| 1-year return | +9.3% | +1.5% |
| 30-day volatility | 15.6% | 10.8% |
| Worst drawdown, 1 year | −18.1% | −11.6% |
| Trailing 12-month yield | 4.01% | 3.08% |
| Holdings | 44 | 96 |
| Top 10 weight | 59.6% | 38.0% |
| Look-through P/E | — | — |
| Holdings vs fair value | — | +0.4% |
| Holdings above 200-day average | — | 35% |
| Net flow, latest 3 reported months | $0 thru Jun 2026 | +$732M thru Jun 2026 |
| 30-day implied volatility | — | 24.9% |
| Holdings as of | as of Oct 8, 2026issuer data | as of Oct 8, 2026issuer data |
Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.
Largest shared holdings
68% of EMIF · 12% of IGF| Holding | EMIF | IGF |
|---|---|---|
| PAC | 8.72% | 3.63% |
| ASR | 4.34% | 1.79% |
| OMAB | 3.51% | 1.45% |
| CHINA MERCHANTS PORT HOLDINGS LTD | 2.78% | 1.17% |
| JIANGSU EXPRESSWAY LTD H | 1.81% | 0.76% |
| ZHEJIANG EXPRESSWAY LTD H | 1.35% | 0.57% |
| SBS | 10.81% | 0.45% |
| COSCO SHIPPING PORTS LTD | 0.99% | 0.42% |
| SHENZHEN INTERNATIONAL HOLDINGS | 0.99% | 0.41% |
| ANHUI EXPRESSWAY LTD H | 0.87% | 0.36% |
| ELPC | 4.68% | 0.20% |
| CHINA RESOURCES POWER LTD | 3.82% | 0.16% |
| BEIJING CAPITAL INTERNATIONAL AIRP | 0.35% | 0.15% |
| ENN ENERGY HOLDINGS LTD | 3.19% | 0.13% |
| CIG | 3.12% | 0.13% |
| CGN POWER LTD H | 3.02% | 0.13% |
| COSCO SHIPPING ENERGY TRANSPORTATI | 5.02% | 0.12% |
| KUNLUN ENERGY LTD | 2.51% | 0.10% |
| HUANENG POWER INTERNATIONAL INC H | 2.31% | 0.10% |
| GUANGDONG INVESTMENT LTD | 2.13% | 0.09% |
| CHINA LONGYUAN POWER GROUP H | 1.19% | 0.05% |
Sector mix of the stock holdings
| Sector | EMIF | IGF | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Utilities | 23.5% | 41.6% | −18.1% |
| Industrials | 16.6% | 7.5% | +9.1% |
| Energy | 0.0% | 3.8% | −3.8% |
| Technology | 0.0% | 2.1% | −2.1% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 0.0% | 0.9% | −0.9% |
| Real Estate | 0.0% | 0.7% | −0.7% |
| Financials | 0.0% | 0.4% | −0.4% |
More: full overlap table · EMIF holdings · IGF holdings
Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.