EUM vs SPXU

ProShares Trust Short MSCI Emerging Markets against ProShares UltraPro Short S&P 500: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Overlap by weight
20%
1 shared positions
Fee gap
6 bp
SPXU is cheaper
1-year return gap
14.1 pts
EUM is ahead
Larger fund
SPXU
$398M

Side by side

EUMSPXU
FundProShares Trust Short MSCI Emerging MarketsProShares UltraPro Short S&P 500
IssuerProSharesProShares
CategoryInverse EquityInverse Equity
Expense ratio0.95%0.89%
Assets$14M$398M
Average daily dollar volume$868K$265M
ListedOct 30, 2007Jun 23, 2009
FrenzyCap score4384
1-month return−0.4%−8.7%
3-month return−4.1%−10.9%
Year to date−21.7%−34.0%
1-year return−23.5%−37.6%
30-day volatility19.3%29.0%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−29.7%−47.3%
Trailing 12-month yield3.65%6.63%
Holdings617
Top 10 weight45.8%31.7%
Look-through P/E——
Holdings vs fair value——
Holdings above 200-day average——
Net flow, latest 3 reported months+$2.6M thru May 2026+$126M thru May 2026
30-day implied volatility235.5%36.5%
Holdings as ofas of Oct 9, 2026issuer dataas of Oct 9, 2026issuer data

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

Largest shared holdings

46% of EUM · 20% of SPXU
HoldingEUMSPXU
IQMM45.78%20.39%

Sector mix of the stock holdings

No sector breakdown: these funds hold few classified stocks.

More: full overlap table · EUM holdings · SPXU holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.