EWY vs MAGC
iShares MSCI South Korea ETF against Roundhill China Magnificent Seven ETF: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.
Overlap by weight
0%
0 shared positions
Fee gap
1 bp
EWY is cheaper
1-year return gap
148.0 pts
EWY is ahead
Larger fund
EWY
$25.2B
Side by side
| EWY | MAGC | |
|---|---|---|
| Fund | iShares MSCI South Korea ETF | Roundhill China Magnificent Seven ETF |
| Issuer | iShares | Roundhill |
| Category | Single Country | Single Country |
| Expense ratio | 0.59% | 0.60% |
| Assets | $25.2B | $13M |
| Average daily dollar volume | $2.3B | $153K |
| Listed | May 9, 2000 | Oct 2, 2024 |
| FrenzyCap score | 61 | 13 |
| 1-month return | −3.0% | +1.3% |
| 3-month return | +5.5% | −4.5% |
| Year to date | +82.3% | −24.1% |
| 1-year return | +110.5% | −37.5% |
| 30-day volatility | 43.6% | 27.4% |
| Worst drawdown, 1 year | −34.2% | −41.8% |
| Trailing 12-month yield | 1.15% | 5.40% |
| Holdings | 85 | 17 |
| Top 10 weight | 62.1% | 110.2% |
| Look-through P/E | — | — |
| Holdings vs fair value | — | — |
| Holdings above 200-day average | — | — |
| Net flow, latest 3 reported months | −$911M thru May 2026 | $0 thru Jun 2026 |
| 30-day implied volatility | 38.2% | 39.0% |
| Holdings as of | as of Oct 8, 2026issuer data | as of Jun 30, 2026SEC filing |
Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.
Largest shared holdings
0% of EWY · 0% of MAGCNo holdings in common.
Sector mix of the stock holdings
| Sector | EWY | MAGC | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Industrials | 0.0% | 8.3% | −8.3% |
| Technology | 0.0% | 4.8% | −4.8% |
More: full overlap table · EWY holdings · MAGC holdings
Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.