FFTY vs LOHA

CapForce IBD 50 ETF against Roundhill HALO ETF: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Fee gap
—
same fee
1-year return gap
—
Larger fund
FFTY
$86M

Side by side

FFTYLOHA
FundCapForce IBD 50 ETFRoundhill HALO ETF
IssuerCapForceRoundhill
CategoryUnclassifiedUnclassified
Expense ratio0.80%—
Assets$86M—
Average daily dollar volume$370K$531K
ListedApr 8, 2015May 13, 2026
FrenzyCap score32—
1-month return+1.7%−2.3%
3-month return−8.6%−2.1%
Year to date+2.8%—
1-year return−10.8%—
30-day volatility18.1%11.5%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−23.3%−9.3%
Trailing 12-month yield1.31%—
Holdings——
Top 10 weight——
Look-through P/E——
Holdings vs fair value——
Holdings above 200-day average——
Net flow, latest 3 reported months−$13M thru Jan 2026—
30-day implied volatility25.7%—
Holdings as of

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

More: full overlap table · FFTY holdings · LOHA holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.