FOPC vs KAMO

Frontier Asset Opportunistic Credit ETF against Kensington Credit Opportunities ETF: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Overlap by weight
17%
1 shared positions
Fee gap
5 bp
FOPC is cheaper
1-year return gap
—
Larger fund
KAMO
$98M

Side by side

FOPCKAMO
FundFrontier Asset Opportunistic Credit ETFKensington Credit Opportunities ETF
IssuerFrontierKensington
CategoryInvestment-Grade CorporateInvestment-Grade Corporate
Expense ratio0.87%0.92%
Assets$32M$98M
Average daily dollar volume$69K$620K
ListedDec 19, 2024Dec 16, 2025
FrenzyCap score613
1-month return−2.3%−2.3%
3-month return−3.2%−2.2%
Year to date−4.5%−4.2%
1-year return−5.3%—
30-day volatility5.3%4.6%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−6.5%−5.4%
Trailing 12-month yield4.54%3.07%
Holdings88
Top 10 weight99.4%100.6%
Look-through P/E——
Holdings vs fair value——
Holdings above 200-day average——
Net flow, latest 3 reported months+$256K thru Jul 2026+$20M thru Jun 2026
30-day implied volatility——
Holdings as ofas of Apr 30, 2026SEC filingas of Jun 30, 2026SEC filing

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

Largest shared holdings

17% of FOPC · 26% of KAMO
HoldingFOPCKAMO
VGIT16.69%26.11%

Sector mix of the stock holdings

No sector breakdown: these funds hold few classified stocks.

More: full overlap table · FOPC holdings · KAMO holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.