FTGC vs USE

First Trust Global Tactical Commodity Strategy Fund against USCF Energy Commodity Strategy Absolute Return Fund: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Fee gap
19 bp
USE is cheaper
1-year return gap
12.7 pts
USE is ahead
Larger fund
FTGC
$3.4B

Side by side

FTGCUSE
FundFirst Trust Global Tactical Commodity Strategy FundUSCF Energy Commodity Strategy Absolute Return Fund
IssuerFirst TrustUSCF
CategoryBroad CommoditiesBroad Commodities
Expense ratio0.98%0.79%
Assets$3.4B$7.3M
Average daily dollar volume$17M$198K
ListedOct 22, 2013May 3, 2023
FrenzyCap score4913
1-month return−1.8%−2.1%
3-month return+9.6%+24.1%
Year to date+33.6%+59.3%
1-year return+18.4%+31.1%
30-day volatility10.1%27.9%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−17.1%−27.9%
Trailing 12-month yield14.10%1.92%
Holdings327
Top 10 weight32.5%56.8%
Look-through P/E——
Holdings vs fair value——
Holdings above 200-day average——
Net flow, latest 3 reported months+$337M thru Jun 2026+$788K thru Jun 2026
30-day implied volatility32.8%—
Holdings as ofas of Jun 30, 2026SEC filingas of Jun 30, 2026SEC filing

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

More: full overlap table · FTGC holdings · USE holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.