FXI vs KWEB

iShares China Large-Cap ETF against KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Overlap by weight
30%
6 shared positions
Fee gap
3 bp
KWEB is cheaper
1-year return gap
24.5 pts
FXI is ahead
Larger fund
KWEB
$4.5B

Side by side

FXIKWEB
FundiShares China Large-Cap ETFKraneShares CSI China Internet ETF
IssueriSharesKraneShares
CategorySingle CountrySingle Country
Expense ratio0.73%0.70%
Assets$4.0B$4.5B
Average daily dollar volume$607M$368M
ListedOct 5, 2004Jul 31, 2013
FrenzyCap score6161
1-month return−0.3%+2.0%
3-month return+2.4%−5.0%
Year to date−10.6%−26.8%
1-year return−16.6%−41.0%
30-day volatility18.9%24.2%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−23.1%−42.9%
Trailing 12-month yield1.98%8.41%
Holdings6034
Top 10 weight57.4%60.0%
Look-through P/E——
Holdings vs fair value——
Holdings above 200-day average——
Net flow, latest 3 reported months−$1.6B thru Jul 2026−$282M thru Jun 2026
30-day implied volatility19.6%26.5%
Holdings as ofas of Oct 8, 2026issuer dataas of Jun 30, 2026SEC filing

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

Largest shared holdings

31% of FXI · 40% of KWEB
HoldingFXIKWEB
TENCENT HOLDINGS8.91%10.44%
ALIBABA GROUP HOLDING9.01%7.70%
MEITUAN4.29%6.83%
NETEASE3.90%6.97%
JD.COM CLASS A2.99%3.87%
TRIP.COM GROUP2.07%3.69%

Sector mix of the stock holdings

SectorFXIKWEBGap
Technology0.0%10.0%−10.0%
Industrials0.0%7.9%−7.9%
Consumer Discretionary0.0%5.4%−5.4%
Communication Services0.0%3.4%−3.4%
Financials0.0%1.0%−1.0%

More: full overlap table · FXI holdings · KWEB holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.