GGM vs MSMR

GGM Macro Alignment ETF against McElhenny Sheffield Managed Risk ETF: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Overlap by weight
17%
1 shared positions
Fee gap
12 bp
GGM is cheaper
1-year return gap
12.1 pts
GGM is ahead
Larger fund
MSMR
$183M

Side by side

GGMMSMR
FundGGM Macro Alignment ETFMcElhenny Sheffield Managed Risk ETF
IssuerGGMMcElhenny
CategoryTactical & RotationTactical & Rotation
Expense ratio0.94%1.06%
Assets$20M$183M
Average daily dollar volume$57K$414K
ListedSep 25, 2023Nov 16, 2021
FrenzyCap score1320
1-month return−0.6%+2.8%
3-month return+1.8%−0.1%
Year to date+13.7%+0.2%
1-year return+13.9%+1.8%
30-day volatility8.5%10.6%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−7.5%−9.8%
Trailing 12-month yield1.38%2.01%
Holdings56
Top 10 weight99.7%99.3%
Look-through P/E——
Holdings vs fair value——
Holdings above 200-day average——
Net flow, latest 3 reported months+$1.2M thru May 2026+$25M thru Jul 2026
30-day implied volatility——
Holdings as ofas of May 31, 2026SEC filingas of Apr 30, 2026SEC filing

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

Largest shared holdings

17% of GGM · 19% of MSMR
HoldingGGMMSMR
XLE17.45%19.41%

Sector mix of the stock holdings

No sector breakdown: these funds hold few classified stocks.

More: full overlap table · GGM holdings · MSMR holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.