GLAM vs PAWZ
Corgi Beauty, Skincare & Aesthetics ETF against ProShares Pet Care ETF: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.
Fee gap
15 bp
GLAM is cheaper
1-year return gap
—
Larger fund
PAWZ
$31M
Side by side
| GLAM | PAWZ | |
|---|---|---|
| Fund | Corgi Beauty, Skincare & Aesthetics ETF | ProShares Pet Care ETF |
| Issuer | Corgi | ProShares |
| Category | Consumer Trends | Consumer Trends |
| Expense ratio | 0.35% | 0.50% |
| Assets | — | $31M |
| Average daily dollar volume | $56K | $75K |
| Listed | May 5, 2026 | Nov 5, 2018 |
| FrenzyCap score | 50 | 32 |
| 1-month return | +2.7% | −1.3% |
| 3-month return | +2.7% | −1.2% |
| Year to date | — | −11.6% |
| 1-year return | — | −12.3% |
| 30-day volatility | 16.7% | 15.2% |
| Worst drawdown, 1 year | −7.0% | −19.7% |
| Trailing 12-month yield | — | 0.75% |
| Holdings | — | 27 |
| Top 10 weight | — | 70.6% |
| Look-through P/E | — | — |
| Holdings vs fair value | — | +2.3% |
| Holdings above 200-day average | — | 30% |
| Net flow, latest 3 reported months | +$1.3M thru Jun 2026 | −$6.2M thru May 2026 |
| 30-day implied volatility | — | 22.2% |
| Holdings as of | as of Oct 9, 2026issuer data |
Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.
More: full overlap table · GLAM holdings · PAWZ holdings
Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.