GMOD vs MVFG

GMO Dynamic Allocation ETF against Monarch Volume Factor Global Unconstrained Index ETF: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Overlap by weight
6%
3 shared positions
Fee gap
91 bp
GMOD is cheaper
1-year return gap
—
Larger fund
MVFG
$182M

Side by side

GMODMVFG
FundGMO Dynamic Allocation ETFMonarch Volume Factor Global Unconstrained Index ETF
IssuerGMOMonarch
CategoryTactical & RotationGlobal
Expense ratio0.50%1.41%
Assets$39M$182M
Average daily dollar volume$299K$390K
ListedOct 13, 2025Mar 6, 2024
FrenzyCap score3524
1-month return−1.0%−1.5%
3-month return+0.7%−1.5%
Year to date+7.3%+9.7%
1-year return—+5.8%
30-day volatility6.9%8.5%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−6.5%−15.3%
Trailing 12-month yield1.36%1.73%
Holdings2124
Top 10 weight76.1%45.0%
Look-through P/E——
Holdings vs fair value——
Holdings above 200-day average——
Net flow, latest 3 reported months+$3.3M thru May 2026+$8.0M thru May 2026
30-day implied volatility——
Holdings as ofas of May 31, 2026SEC filingas of May 31, 2026SEC filing

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

Largest shared holdings

6% of GMOD · 12% of MVFG
HoldingGMODMVFG
VXUS3.16%4.13%
IDEV1.54%3.99%
VSS1.53%4.08%

Sector mix of the stock holdings

No sector breakdown: these funds hold few classified stocks.

More: full overlap table · GMOD holdings · MVFG holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.