GXDW vs MIGO

Global X Funds Global X Dorsey Wright Thematic ETF against MIG Core ETF: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Overlap by weight
0%
0 shared positions
Fee gap
5 bp
MIGO is cheaper
1-year return gap
—
Larger fund
MIGO
$758M

Side by side

GXDWMIGO
FundGlobal X Funds Global X Dorsey Wright Thematic ETFMIG Core ETF
IssuerGlobal XMIG
CategoryUS Equity (Other)US Equity (Other)
Expense ratio0.50%0.45%
Assets$6.1M$758M
Average daily dollar volume$56K$2K
ListedOct 25, 2019Feb 20, 2026
FrenzyCap score1436
1-month return+7.1%+5.5%
3-month return+5.9%+3.7%
Year to date+6.0%—
1-year return−8.3%—
30-day volatility21.6%14.7%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−29.4%−13.4%
Trailing 12-month yield1.41%—
Holdings749
Top 10 weight100.1%49.5%
Look-through P/E—31.6
Holdings vs fair value—+0.6%
Holdings above 200-day average—71%
Net flow, latest 3 reported months−$1.2M thru May 2026+$104M thru May 2026
30-day implied volatility46.7%—
Holdings as ofas of Oct 9, 2026issuer dataas of May 31, 2026SEC filing

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

Largest shared holdings

0% of GXDW · 0% of MIGO

No holdings in common.

Sector mix of the stock holdings

SectorGXDWMIGOGap
Technology0.0%35.4%−35.4%
Health Care0.0%6.6%−6.6%
Financials0.0%4.2%−4.2%
Materials0.0%4.1%−4.1%
Industrials0.0%3.8%−3.8%
Consumer Staples0.0%3.0%−3.0%
Communication Services0.0%0.3%−0.3%

More: full overlap table · GXDW holdings · MIGO holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.