HACK vs ITEQ

Amplify Cybersecurity ETF against Amplify BlueStar Israel Technology ETF: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Overlap by weight
15%
5 shared positions
Fee gap
15 bp
HACK is cheaper
1-year return gap
41.9 pts
HACK is ahead
Larger fund
HACK
$3.6B

Side by side

HACKITEQ
FundAmplify Cybersecurity ETFAmplify BlueStar Israel Technology ETF
IssuerAmplifyAmplify
CategoryCybersecuritySingle Country
Expense ratio0.60%0.75%
Assets$3.6B$109M
Average daily dollar volume$41M$122K
ListedNov 11, 2014Nov 2, 2015
FrenzyCap score6427
1-month return+18.3%+3.0%
3-month return+19.7%−4.6%
Year to date+62.7%+6.9%
1-year return+46.6%+4.7%
30-day volatility37.7%18.7%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−20.6%−14.0%
Trailing 12-month yield0.05%0.79%
Holdings2560
Top 10 weight52.1%42.1%
Look-through P/E94.0—
Holdings vs fair value−0.0%—
Holdings above 200-day average79%—
Net flow, latest 3 reported months−$34M thru Jun 2026−$3.1M thru Jun 2026
30-day implied volatility31.8%33.3%
Holdings as ofas of Jun 30, 2026SEC filingas of Jun 30, 2026SEC filing

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

Largest shared holdings

21% of HACK · 18% of ITEQ
HoldingHACKITEQ
PANW6.58%9.23%
Check Point Software Technolog3.72%3.19%
S3.57%2.20%
VRNS4.08%2.04%
Radware Ltd2.83%1.03%

Sector mix of the stock holdings

SectorHACKITEQGap
Technology80.5%24.6%+55.9%
Industrials9.2%1.2%+8.0%
Financials0.0%1.9%−1.9%
Utilities0.0%1.8%−1.8%
Health Care0.0%1.0%−1.0%

More: full overlap table · HACK holdings · ITEQ holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.