KAMO vs TBFC

Kensington Credit Opportunities ETF against The Brinsmere Fund Conservative ETF: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Overlap by weight
17%
2 shared positions
Fee gap
48 bp
TBFC is cheaper
1-year return gap
—
Larger fund
TBFC
$358M

Side by side

KAMOTBFC
FundKensington Credit Opportunities ETFThe Brinsmere Fund Conservative ETF
IssuerKensingtonThe Brinsmere
CategoryInvestment-Grade CorporateAllocation
Expense ratio0.92%0.44%
Assets$98M$358M
Average daily dollar volume$620K$130K
ListedDec 16, 2025Jan 12, 2024
FrenzyCap score1344
1-month return−2.3%−1.0%
3-month return−2.2%−0.8%
Year to date−4.2%+2.6%
1-year return—+2.8%
30-day volatility4.6%6.2%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−5.4%−5.7%
Trailing 12-month yield3.07%3.15%
Holdings825
Top 10 weight100.6%71.4%
Look-through P/E——
Holdings vs fair value——
Holdings above 200-day average——
Net flow, latest 3 reported months+$20M thru Jun 2026+$3.2M thru Jun 2026
30-day implied volatility——
Holdings as ofas of Jun 30, 2026SEC filingas of Jun 30, 2026SEC filing

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

Largest shared holdings

31% of KAMO · 17% of TBFC
HoldingKAMOTBFC
VGIT26.11%14.52%
VGLT5.35%2.96%

Sector mix of the stock holdings

No sector breakdown: these funds hold few classified stocks.

More: full overlap table · KAMO holdings · TBFC holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.