KBA vs KGRN

KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Index ETF against KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Overlap by weight
13%
7 shared positions
Fee gap
23 bp
KBA is cheaper
1-year return gap
34.7 pts
KBA is ahead
Larger fund
KBA
$117M

Side by side

KBAKGRN
FundKraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Index ETFKraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF
IssuerKraneSharesKraneShares
CategorySingle CountrySingle Country
Expense ratio0.56%0.79%
Assets$117M$47M
Average daily dollar volume$1.2M$298K
ListedMar 4, 2014Oct 12, 2017
FrenzyCap score4424
1-month return−4.7%−2.6%
3-month return−6.3%−6.2%
Year to date−0.1%−19.7%
1-year return+2.7%−32.0%
30-day volatility12.3%13.9%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−13.9%−32.9%
Trailing 12-month yield1.57%1.06%
Holdings5250
Top 10 weight49.1%52.6%
Look-through P/E——
Holdings vs fair value——
Holdings above 200-day average——
Net flow, latest 3 reported months−$40M thru Jun 2026+$1.4M thru Jun 2026
30-day implied volatility52.6%22.5%
Holdings as ofas of Jun 30, 2026SEC filingas of Jun 30, 2026SEC filing

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

Largest shared holdings

18% of KBA · 22% of KGRN
HoldingKBAKGRN
Contemporary Amperex Technology Co., Ltd.8.51%5.28%
China Yangtze Power Co., Ltd.2.47%5.20%
Sungrow Power Supply Co., Ltd.1.62%3.97%
Beijing-Shanghai High Speed Railway Co Ltd1.09%2.67%
NARI Technology Co., Ltd.0.90%2.21%
BYD COMPANY LIMITED2.51%0.84%
China National Nuclear Power Co., Ltd0.71%2.23%

Sector mix of the stock holdings

SectorKBAKGRNGap
Technology0.0%2.8%−2.8%

More: full overlap table · KBA holdings · KGRN holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.