KCCA vs MWHS

KraneShares California Carbon Allowance Strategy ETF against Skylar Electricity Futures ETF: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Fee gap
4 bp
KCCA is cheaper
1-year return gap
—
Larger fund
KCCA
$118M

Side by side

KCCAMWHS
FundKraneShares California Carbon Allowance Strategy ETFSkylar Electricity Futures ETF
IssuerKraneSharesSkylar
CategoryCarbon & OtherCarbon & Other
Expense ratio0.91%0.95%
Assets$118M$650K
Average daily dollar volume$268K$29K
ListedOct 4, 2021Jun 26, 2026
FrenzyCap score203
1-month return−0.7%+12.0%
3-month return−2.9%—
Year to date+0.6%—
1-year return−5.1%—
30-day volatility12.3%82.4%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−17.7%−26.0%
Trailing 12-month yield2.86%—
Holdings327
Top 10 weight179.1%2.2%
Look-through P/E——
Holdings vs fair value——
Holdings above 200-day average——
Net flow, latest 3 reported months−$5.0M thru Jun 2026+$686K thru Jul 2026
30-day implied volatility28.8%—
Holdings as ofas of Jun 30, 2026SEC filingas of Jul 31, 2026SEC filing

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

More: full overlap table · KCCA holdings · MWHS holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.