KEAT vs MPDB

Keating Active ETF against m+ DynaBuffer ETF: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Fee gap
—
same fee
1-year return gap
—
Larger fund
KEAT
$118M

Side by side

KEATMPDB
FundKeating Active ETFm+ DynaBuffer ETF
IssuerKeatingm+
CategoryUnclassifiedUnclassified
Expense ratio0.85%—
Assets$118M—
Average daily dollar volume$57K$121K
ListedMar 26, 2024Aug 11, 2026
FrenzyCap score22—
1-month return−5.1%+1.0%
3-month return+2.4%—
Year to date+7.5%—
1-year return+10.8%—
30-day volatility9.0%4.8%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−11.6%−1.6%
Trailing 12-month yield2.80%—
Holdings30—
Top 10 weight67.6%—
Look-through P/E——
Holdings vs fair value+9.2%—
Holdings above 200-day average43%—
Net flow, latest 3 reported months+$2.2M thru Jul 2026—
30-day implied volatility——
Holdings as ofas of Jul 31, 2026SEC filing

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

More: full overlap table · KEAT holdings · MPDB holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.