LIT vs WATS

Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF against Corgi Battery Energy Storage Systems ETF: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Fee gap
—
same fee
1-year return gap
—
Larger fund
LIT
$1.5B

Side by side

LITWATS
FundGlobal X Lithium & Battery Tech ETFCorgi Battery Energy Storage Systems ETF
IssuerGlobal XCorgi
CategoryEVs & BatteriesEVs & Batteries
Expense ratio0.75%—
Assets$1.5B—
Average daily dollar volume$13M$20K
ListedJul 22, 2010May 5, 2026
FrenzyCap score41—
1-month return−2.9%−4.4%
3-month return−0.7%−13.7%
Year to date+7.5%—
1-year return+16.8%—
30-day volatility18.7%32.4%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−27.2%−42.9%
Trailing 12-month yield0.72%—
Holdings46—
Top 10 weight57.0%—
Look-through P/E——
Holdings vs fair value+3.3%—
Holdings above 200-day average0%—
Net flow, latest 3 reported months−$194M thru Jul 2026+$2.2M thru Jun 2026
30-day implied volatility28.8%—
Holdings as ofas of Oct 9, 2026issuer data

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

More: full overlap table · LIT holdings · WATS holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.