LQID vs PULS

Kurv Enhanced Short Maturity ETF against PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Overlap by weight
0%
0 shared positions
Fee gap
20 bp
PULS is cheaper
1-year return gap
—
Larger fund
PULS
$19.4B

Side by side

LQIDPULS
FundKurv Enhanced Short Maturity ETFPGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF
IssuerKurvPGIM
CategoryUltra-Short BondUltra-Short Bond
Expense ratio0.35%0.15%
Assets$1.0M$19.4B
Average daily dollar volume$281K$188M
ListedMay 12, 2026Apr 5, 2018
FrenzyCap score2190
1-month return−0.4%−0.1%
3-month return−0.9%−0.1%
Year to date—−0.1%
1-year return—−0.3%
30-day volatility1.5%1.4%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−1.3%−0.7%
Trailing 12-month yield1.77%4.38%
Holdings9730
Top 10 weight97.6%6.4%
Look-through P/E——
Holdings vs fair value——
Holdings above 200-day average——
Net flow, latest 3 reported months+$1000K thru May 2026+$2.1B thru May 2026
30-day implied volatility—3.7%
Holdings as ofas of May 31, 2026SEC filingas of May 29, 2026SEC filing

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

Largest shared holdings

0% of LQID · 0% of PULS

No holdings in common.

Sector mix of the stock holdings

No sector breakdown: these funds hold few classified stocks.

More: full overlap table · LQID holdings · PULS holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.