MIGO vs NDAA

MIG Core ETF against Ned Davis Research 360 Dynamic Allocation ETF: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Overlap by weight
18%
1 shared positions
Fee gap
20 bp
MIGO is cheaper
1-year return gap
—
Larger fund
MIGO
$758M

Side by side

MIGONDAA
FundMIG Core ETFNed Davis Research 360 Dynamic Allocation ETF
IssuerMIGNed
CategoryUS Equity (Other)Tactical & Rotation
Expense ratio0.45%0.65%
Assets$758M$196M
Average daily dollar volume$2K$582K
ListedFeb 20, 2026Oct 16, 2024
FrenzyCap score3636
1-month return+5.5%+0.4%
3-month return+3.7%+1.6%
Year to date—+11.0%
1-year return—+9.9%
30-day volatility14.7%8.1%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−13.4%−7.6%
Trailing 12-month yield—2.44%
Holdings499
Top 10 weight49.5%98.5%
Look-through P/E31.6—
Holdings vs fair value+0.6%—
Holdings above 200-day average71%—
Net flow, latest 3 reported months+$104M thru May 2026+$1.1M thru Jun 2026
30-day implied volatility——
Holdings as ofas of May 31, 2026SEC filingas of Jun 30, 2026SEC filing

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

Largest shared holdings

18% of MIGO · 20% of NDAA
HoldingMIGONDAA
VOO17.81%19.69%

Sector mix of the stock holdings

SectorMIGONDAAGap
Technology35.4%0.0%+35.4%
Health Care6.6%0.0%+6.6%
Financials4.2%0.0%+4.2%
Materials4.1%0.0%+4.1%
Industrials3.8%0.0%+3.8%
Consumer Staples3.0%0.0%+3.0%
Communication Services0.3%0.0%+0.3%

More: full overlap table · MIGO holdings · NDAA holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.