MIGO vs OAKL
MIG Core ETF against Oakmark U.S. Concentrated ETF: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.
Fee gap
14 bp
MIGO is cheaper
1-year return gap
—
Larger fund
MIGO
$758M
Side by side
| MIGO | OAKL | |
|---|---|---|
| Fund | MIG Core ETF | Oakmark U.S. Concentrated ETF |
| Issuer | MIG | Oakmark |
| Category | US Equity (Other) | US Equity (Other) |
| Expense ratio | 0.45% | 0.59% |
| Assets | $758M | — |
| Average daily dollar volume | $2K | $1.2M |
| Listed | Feb 20, 2026 | Oct 7, 2026 |
| FrenzyCap score | 36 | 32 |
| 1-month return | +5.5% | — |
| 3-month return | +3.7% | — |
| Year to date | — | — |
| 1-year return | — | — |
| 30-day volatility | 14.7% | — |
| Worst drawdown, 1 year | −13.4% | 0.0% |
| Trailing 12-month yield | — | — |
| Holdings | 49 | — |
| Top 10 weight | 49.5% | — |
| Look-through P/E | 31.6 | — |
| Holdings vs fair value | +0.6% | — |
| Holdings above 200-day average | 71% | — |
| Net flow, latest 3 reported months | +$104M thru May 2026 | — |
| 30-day implied volatility | — | — |
| Holdings as of | as of May 31, 2026SEC filing |
Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.
More: full overlap table · MIGO holdings · OAKL holdings
Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.