MOAT vs NQLT

VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF against Neuberger Quality Select ETF: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Fee gap
2 bp
MOAT is cheaper
1-year return gap
—
Larger fund
MOAT
$11.5B

Side by side

MOATNQLT
FundVanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETFNeuberger Quality Select ETF
IssuerVanEckNeuberger
CategoryQualityQuality
Expense ratio0.46%0.48%
Assets$11.5B—
Average daily dollar volume$44M$50K
ListedApr 24, 2012Jul 10, 2026
FrenzyCap score7123
1-month return+0.5%+2.7%
3-month return+2.2%+3.1%
Year to date+5.0%—
1-year return+7.8%—
30-day volatility12.4%10.3%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−12.4%−4.1%
Trailing 12-month yield1.29%—
Holdings56—
Top 10 weight26.1%—
Look-through P/E21.9—
Holdings vs fair value+10.1%—
Holdings above 200-day average40%—
Net flow, latest 3 reported months−$815M thru Jun 2026—
30-day implied volatility15.8%—
Holdings as ofas of Oct 8, 2026issuer data

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

More: full overlap table · MOAT holdings · NQLT holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.