MOOD vs NDAA

Relative Sentiment Tactical Allocation ETF against Ned Davis Research 360 Dynamic Allocation ETF: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Overlap by weight
16%
2 shared positions
Fee gap
8 bp
NDAA is cheaper
1-year return gap
11.9 pts
MOOD is ahead
Larger fund
NDAA
$196M

Side by side

MOODNDAA
FundRelative Sentiment Tactical Allocation ETFNed Davis Research 360 Dynamic Allocation ETF
IssuerRelativeNed
CategoryTactical & RotationTactical & Rotation
Expense ratio0.73%0.65%
Assets$154M$196M
Average daily dollar volume$1.4M$582K
ListedMay 18, 2022Oct 16, 2024
FrenzyCap score3436
1-month return+1.6%+0.4%
3-month return+3.3%+1.6%
Year to date+17.1%+11.0%
1-year return+21.8%+9.9%
30-day volatility3.4%8.1%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−9.7%−7.6%
Trailing 12-month yield0.34%2.44%
Holdings119
Top 10 weight99.7%98.5%
Look-through P/E——
Holdings vs fair value——
Holdings above 200-day average——
Net flow, latest 3 reported months+$15M thru Jun 2026+$1.1M thru Jun 2026
30-day implied volatility——
Holdings as ofas of Jun 30, 2026SEC filingas of Jun 30, 2026SEC filing

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

Largest shared holdings

16% of MOOD · 20% of NDAA
HoldingMOODNDAA
IEFA8.42%10.20%
BCI7.37%9.98%

Sector mix of the stock holdings

No sector breakdown: these funds hold few classified stocks.

More: full overlap table · MOOD holdings · NDAA holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.