PBL vs TCAN

PGIM Portfolio Ballast ETF against 21Shares Canton Network ETF: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Overlap by weight
0%
0 shared positions
Fee gap
5 bp
PBL is cheaper
1-year return gap
—
Larger fund
PBL
$72M

Side by side

PBLTCAN
FundPGIM Portfolio Ballast ETF21Shares Canton Network ETF
IssuerPGIM21Shares
CategoryUnclassifiedUnclassified
Expense ratio0.45%0.50%
Assets$72M$6.3M
Average daily dollar volume$365K$333K
ListedDec 12, 2022May 6, 2026
FrenzyCap score3928
1-month return+1.3%+23.1%
3-month return+1.5%−8.7%
Year to date+9.3%—
1-year return+8.4%—
30-day volatility8.9%91.1%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−7.3%−45.8%
Trailing 12-month yield2.02%—
Holdings104
Top 10 weight84.3%95.2%
Look-through P/E——
Holdings vs fair value——
Holdings above 200-day average——
Net flow, latest 3 reported months$0 thru May 2026+$6.8M thru Jun 2026
30-day implied volatility——
Holdings as ofas of May 29, 2026SEC filingas of Jun 30, 2026SEC filing

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

Largest shared holdings

0% of PBL · 0% of TCAN

No holdings in common.

Sector mix of the stock holdings

No sector breakdown: these funds hold few classified stocks.

More: full overlap table · PBL holdings · TCAN holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.