QQQI vs RECI

NEOS Nasdaq 100 High Income ETF against Columbia Research Enhanced Core Premium Income ETF: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Fee gap
38 bp
RECI is cheaper
1-year return gap
—
Larger fund
QQQI
$15.1B

Side by side

QQQIRECI
FundNEOS Nasdaq 100 High Income ETFColumbia Research Enhanced Core Premium Income ETF
IssuerNEOSColumbia
CategoryCovered CallCovered Call
Expense ratio0.68%0.30%
Assets$15.1B—
Average daily dollar volume$219M$3K
ListedJan 29, 2024Jul 14, 2026
FrenzyCap score8156
1-month return+4.0%+0.7%
3-month return+1.6%—
Year to date+4.5%—
1-year return+2.4%—
30-day volatility12.0%6.3%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−13.7%−1.4%
Trailing 12-month yield13.58%0.81%
Holdings105—
Top 10 weight45.1%—
Look-through P/E34.5—
Holdings vs fair value−3.8%—
Holdings above 200-day average77%—
Net flow, latest 3 reported months+$2.4B thru Jun 2026—
30-day implied volatility13.2%—
Holdings as ofas of Jun 30, 2026SEC filing

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

More: full overlap table · QQQI holdings · RECI holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.