RMRC vs SECT

ARMOR Core Risk-Managed ETF against Main Sector Rotation ETF: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Overlap by weight
54%
8 shared positions
Fee gap
11 bp
RMRC is cheaper
1-year return gap
—
Larger fund
SECT
$2.9B

Side by side

RMRCSECT
FundARMOR Core Risk-Managed ETFMain Sector Rotation ETF
IssuerARMORMain Management
CategoryBufferTactical & Rotation
Expense ratio0.58%0.69%
Assets$7.1M$2.9B
Average daily dollar volume$29K$10M
ListedFeb 23, 2026Sep 5, 2017
FrenzyCap score3254
1-month return−0.0%+2.9%
3-month return−0.5%+2.8%
Year to date—+13.1%
1-year return—+14.4%
30-day volatility8.5%11.5%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−6.8%−11.0%
Trailing 12-month yield0.94%0.68%
Holdings1213
Top 10 weight93.9%97.9%
Look-through P/E——
Holdings vs fair value——
Holdings above 200-day average——
Net flow, latest 3 reported months+$6.8M thru May 2026+$81M thru Jul 2026
30-day implied volatility—15.4%
Holdings as ofas of May 31, 2026SEC filingas of Apr 30, 2026SEC filing

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

Largest shared holdings

66% of RMRC · 89% of SECT
HoldingRMRCSECT
XLC10.96%10.51%
XLK9.70%33.05%
XLY8.20%9.67%
XLF7.51%14.67%
XLI7.35%10.58%
XLE6.83%4.22%
XLB5.82%4.20%
XLV10.02%2.34%

Sector mix of the stock holdings

No sector breakdown: these funds hold few classified stocks.

More: full overlap table · RMRC holdings · SECT holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.