TBFC vs XNAV

The Brinsmere Fund Conservative ETF against FundX Aggressive ETF: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Overlap by weight
10%
3 shared positions
Fee gap
83 bp
TBFC is cheaper
1-year return gap
13.7 pts
XNAV is ahead
Larger fund
TBFC
$358M

Side by side

TBFCXNAV
FundThe Brinsmere Fund Conservative ETFFundX Aggressive ETF
IssuerThe BrinsmereFundX
CategoryAllocationAllocation
Expense ratio0.44%1.27%
Assets$358M$32M
Average daily dollar volume$130K$68K
ListedJan 12, 2024Jul 1, 2002
FrenzyCap score4416
1-month return−1.0%+3.2%
3-month return−0.8%+1.7%
Year to date+2.6%+15.2%
1-year return+2.8%+16.5%
30-day volatility6.2%17.0%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−5.7%−16.3%
Trailing 12-month yield3.15%0.50%
Holdings2522
Top 10 weight71.4%61.2%
Look-through P/E——
Holdings vs fair value——
Holdings above 200-day average——
Net flow, latest 3 reported months+$3.2M thru Jun 2026−$1.1M thru Jun 2026
30-day implied volatility——
Holdings as ofas of Jun 30, 2026SEC filingas of Jun 30, 2026SEC filing

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

Largest shared holdings

11% of TBFC · 18% of XNAV
HoldingTBFCXNAV
SPMO4.92%4.38%
VUG4.20%9.37%
AVDV1.53%4.36%

Sector mix of the stock holdings

No sector breakdown: these funds hold few classified stocks.

More: full overlap table · TBFC holdings · XNAV holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.