TBFG vs XNAV

The Brinsmere Fund Growth ETF against FundX Aggressive ETF: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Overlap by weight
13%
3 shared positions
Fee gap
81 bp
TBFG is cheaper
1-year return gap
6.4 pts
XNAV is ahead
Larger fund
TBFG
$386M

Side by side

TBFGXNAV
FundThe Brinsmere Fund Growth ETFFundX Aggressive ETF
IssuerThe BrinsmereFundX
CategoryAllocationAllocation
Expense ratio0.46%1.27%
Assets$386M$32M
Average daily dollar volume$40K$68K
ListedJan 12, 2024Jul 1, 2002
FrenzyCap score4416
1-month return+0.0%+3.2%
3-month return+1.1%+1.7%
Year to date+9.3%+15.2%
1-year return+10.1%+16.5%
30-day volatility8.8%17.0%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−7.8%−16.3%
Trailing 12-month yield2.43%0.50%
Holdings2522
Top 10 weight62.3%61.2%
Look-through P/E——
Holdings vs fair value——
Holdings above 200-day average——
Net flow, latest 3 reported months−$4.7M thru Jun 2026−$1.1M thru Jun 2026
30-day implied volatility——
Holdings as ofas of Jun 30, 2026SEC filingas of Jun 30, 2026SEC filing

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

Largest shared holdings

17% of TBFG · 18% of XNAV
HoldingTBFGXNAV
VUG5.62%9.37%
SPMO8.03%4.38%
AVDV2.98%4.36%

Sector mix of the stock holdings

No sector breakdown: these funds hold few classified stocks.

More: full overlap table · TBFG holdings · XNAV holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.