ZAP vs ZSB
Global X U.S. Electrification ETF against USCF Sustainable Battery Metals Strategy Fund: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.
Fee gap
9 bp
ZAP is cheaper
1-year return gap
13.4 pts
ZSB is ahead
Larger fund
ZAP
$449M
Side by side
| ZAP | ZSB | |
|---|---|---|
| Fund | Global X U.S. Electrification ETF | USCF Sustainable Battery Metals Strategy Fund |
| Issuer | Global X | USCF |
| Category | EVs & Batteries | EVs & Batteries |
| Expense ratio | 0.50% | 0.59% |
| Assets | $449M | $2.0M |
| Average daily dollar volume | $4.5M | $6K |
| Listed | Dec 17, 2024 | Jan 10, 2023 |
| FrenzyCap score | 57 | 15 |
| 1-month return | +0.1% | −5.0% |
| 3-month return | −6.2% | −6.3% |
| Year to date | +8.7% | −2.9% |
| 1-year return | +4.1% | +17.5% |
| 30-day volatility | 18.6% | 14.5% |
| Worst drawdown, 1 year | −13.5% | −18.5% |
| Trailing 12-month yield | 1.88% | 0.94% |
| Holdings | 47 | 12 |
| Top 10 weight | 44.1% | 46.5% |
| Look-through P/E | 24.5 | — |
| Holdings vs fair value | −4.0% | — |
| Holdings above 200-day average | 31% | — |
| Net flow, latest 3 reported months | +$47M thru Jul 2026 | −$3.3M thru Jun 2026 |
| 30-day implied volatility | — | — |
| Holdings as of | as of Oct 9, 2026issuer data | as of Jun 30, 2026SEC filing |
Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.
More: full overlap table · ZAP holdings · ZSB holdings
Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.