Aecom(ACM)
Stock quote, options chain, IV rank, technicals, AI analysis, and institutional ownership.
Market data may be delayed, incomplete, or inaccurate. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Verify quotes with your broker before trading. See Terms §17.
- 52-Week Range
- $58.42 – $135.52
- YTD
- -36.84%
- IV Rank (30D)
- 33.63
- Straddle Price
- $3.90
- P/C Vol Ratio
- 1.20
- Market Cap
- $7.5B
A blended fair-value estimate combining up to six valuation methods. Each method is weighted by how well it fits the company — DCF down-weights for unprofitable names; DDM only fires for steady dividend payers; comparables down-weight when peer multiples disagree.
- DCF (quality-aware) — projects free cash flow with a horizon that scales to business quality. True compounders (quality 6/6) get 10 years explicit + 10 years fade before terminal; cyclical/struggling names (quality 0-1) get a 5-year terminal cliff. Quality is scored from ROE, gross margin, growth, FCF margin, debt load, and FCF consistency — the same factors that drive market premium for compounders.
- Market-Implied Growth (in Model Inputs) — reverse-DCF that answers "what growth rate is the market pricing in?". Lets you sanity-check the deviation: if implied growth is plausible for the business, the model's bearish flag may be wrong; if implausible, the market may be over-extrapolating.
- DDM (Gordon Growth Dividend Model) — values the stream of future dividends. Only used when trailing yield ≥ 2% and dividend payments are stable — below that the dividend is a token payout and Gordon (which values only the dividend stream) systematically underprices growth names, so those route to DCF + comparables + market anchor instead.
- P/E, EV/EBITDA, P/B, P/S — applies the peer-group median multiple to this company's per-share metric. Peers come from the same set as the "Related symbols" card. Earnings/sales metrics are forward-tilted by the company's recent revenue growth (capped at 25%) so they're comparable to peers' growth-embedded multiples — mimics how analysts use NTM rather than TTM. Per-multiple weights are biased by company quality (e.g. P/B down-weighted for asset-light tech).
- Market Anchor (SMA50) — the 50-day moving average, weighted by recent trading-range stability (tighter Bollinger bands → higher weight). Captures information fundamentals miss (forward consensus, sentiment, supply/demand) — but only when recent trading is steady enough that the market has converged on a view. During wild breakouts or breakdowns the anchor's weight collapses.
- Options Expected (B-L 30d) — the risk-neutral expected stock price at 30-day options expiration, derived from the full implied-volatility surface via Breeden-Litzenberger (second derivative of call price wrt strike → implied PDF, then E[S_T]). Forward-looking, captures all options-implied information (smile, skew, term structure) in one number. Weighted by chain liquidity. SP500-only at present (pre-computed daily). Backtest evidence: adds modest alpha across most bucket × holding combos.
- Blended value — weighted average. Confidence reflects how many methods fired and how tight peer dispersion is.
- Deviation pill — green when blended FV ≥ 10% above current price (undervalued); red when ≥ 10% below; grey otherwise.
| 10-yr Treasury (rf) | 4.96% |
| Beta vs SPY | 0.88 |
| Cost of Equity (CAPM) | 9.37% (VRP-adj) |
| WACC | 8.38% |
| Volatility Risk Premium | +85.6pp (IV − HV30) |
| Effective Tax Rate | 18.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY, DCF input) | -10.0% |
| DCF Horizon | 5 years explicit + fade |
| Free Cash Flow (TTM) | $0.2B |
| Return on Equity (TTM) | 13.1% |
| Book / Price | 31.3% — banking bias active (P/B is primary) |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 5.7% |
| FCF Margin (TTM) | 1.3% |
| Debt / Equity | 1.11 |
| Quality Score | 1/6 — cyclical/struggling (5y DCF) |
| Market-Implied Growth | +27.1% (reverse-DCF on current price) |
| SMA 50 | $66.95 (Market Anchor value) |
| SMA 20 / Bollinger Mid | $64.38 |
| Bollinger Width / SMA20 | 23.5% (drives anchor stability) |
| Net Debt | $1.9B |
| Market Cap | $8B |
| Method | Implied Price | Weight | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| DCF | $0.86 | 23% | |
| DDM (Gordon) | $6.97 | 18% | |
| Peer P/E | $65.13 | 7% | median 29.9× · 8 peers |
| Peer EV/EBITDA | $124.97 | 7% | median 19.6× · 8 peers |
| Peer P/B | $109.70 | 7% | median 6.0× · 8 peers |
| Peer P/S | $529.02 | 7% | median 4.5× · 8 peers |
| Market Anchor (SMA50) | $66.95 | 15% | stability 32% (BB-width) |
| Options Expected (B-L 30d) | $59.25 | 17% | 15 strikes · skew +0.68 |
- Industry (SIC)
- SERVICES-ENGINEERING SERVICES (8711)
- Exchange
- XNYS
- Market Cap
- $7.5B
Aecom is one of the largest global providers of advisory, design, and engineering services. It serves a broad spectrum of end markets, including water, transportation, and environment. Based in Dallas, Aecom employs 51,000 people. The company generated $16.1 billion in sales in fiscal 2025.
Each spoke is this symbol's rank within its sector (0–100; the dotted ring marks the sector median at 50). Higher is more constructive for a long. One spoke — News sentiment — is an absolute reading, not a sector rank. Grayed spokes have no data. A fuller shape is a summary, not a recommendation.
| Month | Avg Return | Years of Data |
|---|---|---|
| Jan | -1.07% | 19 |
| Feb | +2.63% | 19 |
| Mar | -0.49% | 19 |
| Apr | +1.72% | 19 |
| May | -0.36% | 20 |
| Jun | +1.23% | 20 |
| Jul | +0.77% | 20 |
| Aug | -0.09% | 20 |
| Sep | -0.09% | 20 |
| Oct | +0.35% | 19 |
| Nov | +6.10% | 19 |
| Dec | +0.28% | 19 |
Quick-reference for reading the values below. Indicators combine to confirm a view — no single one is a trade signal on its own.
- SMA 20 / 50 / 200 — price above = uptrend, below = downtrend. SMA 50 crossing SMA 200 is the golden/death cross.
- EMA 12 / 26 — faster-reacting averages; 12 above 26 is short-term bullish.
- MACD — bullish when MACD > signal (green badge), bearish when below. Divergence from price often precedes reversals.
- ADX (14) — trend strength regardless of direction. <20 range, 20–25 weak trend, 25–50 trend, >50 strong trend.
- +DI / −DI — +DI > −DI favors bulls; the reverse favors bears. Read alongside ADX.
- RSI (14) — <30 oversold, >70 overbought. 40–60 is neutral; trending names can stay extreme.
- Stochastic %K / %D — <20 oversold, >80 overbought. %K crossing %D is an early momentum signal.
- Williams %R — inverted scale: <−80 oversold, >−20 overbought.
Oscillators work best in range-bound markets; in strong trends they give premature reversal signals.
- Bollinger Bands — price at upper band = overbought, lower = oversold. Narrow bands (squeeze) often precede expansion.
- OBV — cumulative volume; rising OBV confirms uptrend, falling OBV confirms downtrend. Divergence from price is a warning.
- Vol SMA 20 / Vol ROC — today's volume vs. 20-day average. Positive ROC with price move = conviction.
- ATR / True Range — average daily $ move; sizing and stop-loss reference.
- HV 20 / 30 / 60 — realized (historical) volatility. Compare to IV on the options cards: IV > HV = rich premium.
Confluence matters: trend + momentum + volume agreeing carries far more weight than any single indicator. For how these feed the spread scanner score, see the algorithm docs →
Trend Indicators
Momentum Oscillators
Volume & Volatility
Data Summary
LLM Stock Analysis Report
SYMBOL: ACM
Executive Summary Overall Assessment: BEARISH with confidence level 7/10 Key Drivers: * Technical signals indicating a potential downtrend * Recent negative news sentiment Primary Risks: * Potential breakdown below SMA 50 support * Increasing volatility could exacerbate losses
Investment Thesis: AECOM's stock price is likely to decline due to the recent negative news sentiment and technical indicators pointing towards a bearish trend. However, the options market pricing suggests a potential mean reversion, which could lead to a short-term bounce.
Recent News Sentiment Impact: The recent negative news headlines have contributed to the bearish tone, with sentiment analysis indicating a 70% negative sentiment over the past week.
Technical Analysis
- Trend Direction: Short-term (1-4 weeks): Bearish
- SMA 20: $80.24
- SMA 50: $84.70
- EMA 12: $76.73
- MACD: -3.64 / Signal: -1.17 / Histogram: -2.47 (bearish)
- Support/Resistance Levels: Key price levels from moving averages and technical patterns:
- Upper Bollinger Band: $90.40
- Middle Bollinger Band: $80.24
- Lower Bollinger Band: $70.07
- Momentum Signals:
- RSI (14): 25.95 (oversold)
- Stochastic %K: 18.17
- Stochastic %D: 13.75
- Williams %R: -79.81
- Volume Analysis: Volume trends and institutional interest signals:
- Volume SMA 20: 1444855.09
- On-Balance Volume (OBV): 4829728.41
- Volume Rate of Change: 60.67%
News & Sentiment Analysis
- Recent Headlines Summary: Key themes from last 10 news articles:
- Negative sentiment prevailing, with 70% negative headlines over the past week.
- Sentiment Assessment: Aggregate news sentiment (positive/negative/neutral): NEGATIVE
- Catalyst Identification: Upcoming events, earnings, product launches, regulatory changes: None
Risk & Volatility Assessment
- Beta Interpretation: Risk relative to market (beta >1.2 = high risk, <0.8 = defensive): 0.94 (Moderate volatility - stock generally follows market)
- Volatility Regime: Current vs historical volatility levels:
- Historical Volatility: HV20 50.2%, HV30 44.4%, HV60 38.3%
- Options Market Signals: IV rank, put/call ratios, unusual activity:
- IV Rank: 59.6% (Medium - shows if volatility is historically high/low)
- Current IV: 83.6%
- Expected Move: $6.80 (34 DTE), 7-DTE: $1.32
- Volume Flow: 491 calls vs 86 puts
- Open Interest: 1,884 calls vs 617 puts
- Put/Call Volume Ratio: 0.17 (Bullish sentiment)
- Downside Protection: Support levels and risk management considerations:
- Critical price level: $70.07 (Lower Bollinger Band)
Market Context & Positioning
- Sector Performance: Relative strength vs sector/market:
- ACM's performance relative to the sector is mediocre.
- Institutional Activity: Volume patterns suggesting institutional interest:
- Institutional traders are showing mild interest in the stock, with a put/call volume ratio of 0.17 (Bullish sentiment).
- Correlation Analysis: How stock moves relative to market (R-squared interpretation):
- ACM's movements are moderately correlated with the market, with an R-squared value of 0.36.
- Relative Valuation: Position within trading range:
- ACM's valuation is relatively low compared to its peers and historical averages.
Key Levels & Action Items
- Critical Price Levels: Support/resistance to monitor:
- Lower Bollinger Band: $70.07
- Middle Bollinger Band: $80.24
- Breakout/Breakdown Levels: Technical levels that could trigger significant moves:
- Upper Bollinger Band: $90.40
- Time-Sensitive Catalysts: Earnings dates, FDA approvals, product launches: None
- Risk Management: Stop-loss levels and position sizing considerations:
- Set a stop-loss at $70.07 (Lower Bollinger Band) to manage risk.
This comprehensive analysis provides a detailed assessment of ACM's technical, news, and market conditions. The report highlights the bearish trend direction, recent negative news sentiment, and potential support/resistance levels. It also provides insights into volatility, institutional activity, correlation analysis, and relative valuation.
| Earnings Date | Timing | Expected Move | Actual Move | Ratio | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-18 | After-Close | 6.66% | 0.34% | 0.05x | Within |
| 2025-02-03 | After-Close | 5.33% | 0.47% | 0.09x | Within |
| 2025-05-05 | After-Close | 4.62% | 0.53% | 0.11x | Within |
| 2025-08-04 | After-Close | 5.30% | 2.59% | 0.49x | Within |
| 2025-11-18 | After-Close | 2.93% | 11.10% | 3.79x | Exceeded |
| 2026-02-09 | After-Close | 7.02% | 1.47% | 0.21x | Within |
| 2026-05-11 | After-Close | 7.77% | 13.74% | 1.77x | Exceeded |
| 2026-08-10 | After-Close | 7.67% | 8.53% | 1.11x | Exceeded |
- IV Rank (30D)
- 33.63
- IV Rank (7D)
- 33.63
- Avg IV
- 83.8%
- Straddle (30D)
- $3.90
- Straddle (7D)
- $3.90
- P/C Volume
- 1.20
Each spread is ranked by a composite score built in three stages. Full documentation →
score = P(profit) × (credit / spread_width)
P(profit) from short leg delta (1 − |delta|), penalised above 85%. Credit uses mid-price to handle illiquid chains fairly.
RR and BF (30-delta) from the persisted per-symbol skew snapshot — wing strikes picked by real greeks.delta, not a moneyness proxy. Put skew boosts bull puts, penalises bear calls. High butterfly boosts iron condors. Calendars are skew-neutral.
- RSI <40 bullish / >60 bearish
- MACD crossover + histogram trend
- Price vs SMA 50 & SMA 200
- Stochastic %K <20 / >80
- Williams %R <−80 / >−20
- Blended ATR + straddle expected-move penalty
- Bollinger Band signal (+ counter-trend penalty)
- BB width — vol contraction boost for ICs
- IV rank ≥ 75 → strong boost for credit spreads
- IV rank < 25 → penalty (selling cheap vol)
- Min open interest across all legs
- OI < 100 → −0.10 · OI < 500 → −0.05
score = base_score × skew_multiplier × tech_multiplier
Both multipliers are shown per spread. Beta is informational only — ATR already captures realized vol. Full algorithm documentation →
Enter a ticker to scan for optimal spread opportunities.
Evaluates all bull put, bear call, iron condor, and calendar spread combinations using GPU-accelerated analysis.
IV(put wing) − IV(ATM), in vol pointsHow much the OTM put trades above (or below) the at-the-money strike. Measures the height of the put-side tail relative to ATM — i.e. how expensive crash insurance is on this name.
- Positive (typical) — wing IV > ATM IV. Standard equity put skew: portfolios bid up crash protection, so OTM puts trade richer than ATM.
- Near zero or negative (unusual) — wing IV ≤ ATM IV. Flat or inverted put side. Common when there's no fear demand, in tightly mean-reverting names, or right after an earnings catalyst clears.
- Percentile vs own 3-yr history: high = wings rich (good time to sell wing premium); low = wings cheap (good time to buy protection).
- Not directional — high or low wings don't predict up or down moves. It's a price tag on tail insurance, not a forecast.
IV(call wing) − IV(put wing), equal delta on each sideWhich side of the smile is the market paying up for? Measures the tilt of the surface — call skew vs put skew at matched deltas.
- Negative (typical) — puts richer than calls. Standard equity behavior: hedging demand makes puts carry a premium. Most large-caps sit in the −1 to −5 vol-point range.
- Strongly negative (< −5 pts) — heavy downside hedging, elevated fear, or an upcoming catalyst (earnings, FDA, macro event). Worth flagging.
- Positive — calls richer than puts. Unusual for equities; signals bullish momentum, short-squeeze positioning, or takeover/M&A speculation.
- Near zero — symmetric surface. Market sees roughly equal up/down risk. Rare for large-caps; more common in commodities and FX.
Wing-vs-ATM tells you how expensive the tails are. Risk Reversal tells you which side is favored. Combined:
- High wing percentile + deeply negative RR → strong put bid; stress or major event priced in. Owning protection costs a premium; selling put premium is dangerous.
- Low wing percentile + near-zero RR → complacency; insurance cheap and balanced. Good environment to add cheap downside hedges.
- Positive RR + elevated wings → call-side fear-of-missing-out; common in squeeze setups. Upside calls expensive, downside puts not bid.
Percentile is the rank of today's reading within ~3 years of this symbol's own history. High percentile = wings are rich relative to history; not a directional signal. Skew is read off the chain in real time, not from CBOE SKEW.
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility surface.
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility smile.
- Beta (1Y vs SPY)
- 0.90
- Correlation (SPY)
- 31.5%
- R²
- 0.10
- Ann. Volatility
- 37.2%
- SPY Volatility
- 13.0%
Moderate volatility - stock generally follows market
Institutional managers with $100M+ AUM file Form 13F-HR quarterly, due 45 days after quarter end. Holdings are reported gross at quarter-end market value — they are a snapshot, not a real-time position.
- Shares — long equity positions in this name, aggregated across share classes.
- Calls / Puts — notional value of long call / put exposure where this ticker is the underlying.
- % of Float — holder's reported shares divided by the latest diluted shares outstanding. Sums above 100% indicate large custodian / prime broker positions where the same shares are reported by multiple filers.
- Custodian badge — filers with more than 5,000 holdings are typically broker-dealers / custodians reporting customer-held shares, not active managers.
Each filer is counted once at its latest 13F-HR filing. New filings are ingested on a weekly cadence.
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | SUSQUEHANNA INTERNATIONAL GROUP, LLP Custodian | $6.24M | 29.65% | 2026-06-30 |
| 2 | IMC-Chicago, LLC Custodian | $3.93M | 18.67% | 2026-06-30 |
| 3 | CITADEL ADVISORS LLC Custodian | $3.83M | 18.21% | 2026-06-30 |
| 4 | JANE STREET GROUP, LLC Custodian | $2.76M | 13.13% | 2026-06-30 |
| 5 | SIMPLEX TRADING, LLC Custodian | $1.12M | 5.34% | 2026-06-30 |
| 6 | WOLVERINE TRADING, LLC Custodian | $1.12M | 5.31% | 2025-09-30 |
| 7 | GROUP ONE TRADING LLC Custodian | $1.10M | 5.24% | 2026-06-30 |
| 8 | Walleye Trading LLC | $453.70K | 2.16% | 2026-06-30 |
| 9 | Walleye Capital LLC | $335.04K | 1.59% | 2026-06-30 |
| 10 | Twin Tree Management, LP | $146.58K | 0.70% | 2026-06-30 |
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | SUSQUEHANNA INTERNATIONAL GROUP, LLP Custodian | $10.66M | 35.07% | 2026-06-30 |
| 2 | JANE STREET GROUP, LLC Custodian | $7.58M | 24.94% | 2026-06-30 |
| 3 | IMC-Chicago, LLC Custodian | $4.87M | 16.03% | 2026-06-30 |
| 4 | CITADEL ADVISORS LLC Custodian | $2.81M | 9.26% | 2026-06-30 |
| 5 | GROUP ONE TRADING LLC Custodian | $2.37M | 7.79% | 2026-06-30 |
| 6 | Walleye Trading LLC | $537.46K | 1.77% | 2026-06-30 |
| 7 | Walleye Capital LLC | $523.50K | 1.72% | 2026-06-30 |
| 8 | TWO SIGMA INVESTMENTS, LP Custodian | $425.78K | 1.40% | 2026-06-30 |
| 9 | SIMPLEX TRADING, LLC Custodian | $328.06K | 1.08% | 2026-06-30 |
| 10 | WOLVERINE TRADING, LLC Custodian | $285.71K | 0.94% | 2025-09-30 |
| Filed | Reporter | Role | Action | Shares | Avg Price | Net $ | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-06-16 | Lara Poloni | PRESIDENT | Buy (P) | +4,224 | $70.63 | $298.3K | EDGAR |
| 2026-05-14 | Troy Rudd | CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER | Buy (P) | +4,225 | $71.02 | $300.1K | EDGAR |
| 2026-05-14 | Gaurav Kapoor | CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER (PAO) | Buy (P) | +1,420 | $71.12 | $101.0K | EDGAR |
| 2026-03-05 | Brad W Buss | Director | Award (A) | +2,002 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-03-05 | Kristy Pipes | Director | Award (A) | +2,002 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-03-05 | DEREK J KERR | Director | Award (A) | +2,002 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-03-05 | Douglas Stotlar | Director | Award (A) | +2,236 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-03-05 | Daniel R. Tishman | Director | Award (A) | +2,002 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-03-05 | Noordende Alexander M van 't | Director | Award (A) | +2,002 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-03-05 | Janet Carol Wolfenbarger | Director | Award (A) | +2,002 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2025-12-23 | Troy Rudd | CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER | Gift (G) | −600 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2025-12-17 | Troy Rudd | CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER | Mixed | +123,837 | $97.96 | -$4.76M | EDGAR |
| 2025-12-17 | Lara Poloni | PRESIDENT | Mixed | +19,031 | $97.43 | -$3.02M | EDGAR |
| 2025-12-17 | Gaurav Kapoor | CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER (PAO) | Mixed | +30,221 | $97.96 | -$1.66M | EDGAR |
| 2025-12-17 | David Y. Gan | CHIEF LEGAL OFFICER | Mixed | +534 | $97.82 | -$2.55M | EDGAR |
| # | Insider | Role | Shares | Disclosed Exposure | Lifetime OM Net | Filings | Last Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | H Whitney VI L P J | 7,977,663 | $485.76M | -$137.76M | 1 | 2007-05-15 | |
| 2 | Peter A Feld | Director | 5,977,142 | $363.95M | $8.51M | 3 | 2020-03-12 |
| 3 | Michael S Burke | Chairman & CEO | 771,003 | $46.95M | -$18.21M | 60 | 2020-03-19 |
| 4 | J. H. Whitney Equity Partners VI, LLC | 638,213 | $38.86M | -$137.76M | 1 | 2007-05-15 | |
| 5 | RICHARD G NEWMAN | Director | 602,263 | $36.67M | -$94.39M | 107 | 2015-03-06 |
| 6 | Raymond W Holdsworth Jr | Vice Chairman, Corp Develop | 508,698 | $30.97M | -$13.64M | 29 | 2008-02-19 |
| 7 | Anthony Chun Kin Shum | Chairman, Asia | 455,132 | $27.71M | -$9.79M | 40 | 2014-10-20 |
| 8 | Troy Rudd | CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER | 401,963 | $24.48M | -$40.45M | 23 | 2026-05-14 |
| 9 | Francis S Y Bong | Director | 307,890 | $18.75M | -$40.36M | 97 | 2013-12-17 |
| 10 | JAMES H FORDYCE | Director | 249,143 | $15.17M | -$138.31M | 37 | 2019-03-08 |
What is Form 144? A notice of intent to sell restricted or control stock under Rule 144. Affiliates (officers, directors, 10%+ owners) and holders of restricted shares must file Form 144 when planning to sell more than 5,000 shares or $50,000 in any 3-month rolling window.
How it relates to Form 4: Form 144 is filed before the trade (up to 90 days in advance); Form 4 is filed within 2 business days after the trade executes. Not every Form 144 results in a sale — the filer may cancel or delay. Look for the corresponding Form 4 on the Insider Activity card to confirm a sale actually happened.
10b5-1 plans: Trades made under a pre-scheduled Rule 10b5-1 plan are not discretionary — they execute automatically on dates set months earlier, regardless of news. High 10b5-1 percentages mean less per-filing signal value, though cumulative selling volume still matters.
"Notice value": Aggregate market value the filer wrote into the Form 144 — i.e. the size of the planned sale, not necessarily the executed dollars. Amendments (Form 144/A) and post-cancellation refilings can inflate this if you sum naively; the rollup above excludes filings with zero stated value.
Source & freshness: Sourced from public Form 144 filings. Refreshed daily; new filings typically appear here the morning after they are filed.
| Filed | Filer | Role | Shares | Notice Value | Planned Sale | Broker | Plan | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-12-17 | LARA POLONI | OFFICER | 17,533 | $1.70M | 2025-12-17 | MERRILL LYNCH | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
| 2025-12-17 | DAVID GAN | OFFICER | 9,502 | $921.8K | 2025-12-17 | MERRILL LYNCH | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
| 2025-12-15 | DAVID GAN | OFFICER | 6,000 | $593.1K | 2025-12-15 | MERRILL LYNCH | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
| 2025-08-15 | Rudd Troy | Officer | 53,097 | $6.35M | 2025-08-15 | MERRILL LYNCH | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
| 2024-12-17 | Gan David Y. | Officer | 9,398 | $1.04M | 2024-12-17 | MERRILL LYNCH | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
| 2024-12-16 | Gan David Y. | Officer | 11,500 | $1.28M | 2024-12-16 | MERRILL LYNCH | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
| 2024-11-06 | Kapoor Gaurav | Officer | 42,400 | $4.89M | 2024-11-06 | MERRILL LYNCH | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
| 2024-10-01 | Rudd Troy | Officer | 100,000 | $10.27M | 2024-10-01 | MERRILL LYNCH | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
| 2024-08-15 | Rudd Troy | Officer | 34,710 | $3.35M | 2024-08-15 | MERRILL LYNCH | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
| 2024-05-10 | Stotlar Douglas | Director | 7,179 | $671.3K | 2024-05-10 | Merrill Lynch | — | EDGAR |
| Filing Date | Accession | Link |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-06-03 | 0001104659-26-069779 | EDGAR |
| 2026-05-11 | 0001104659-26-058656 | EDGAR |
| 2026-03-10 | 0001104659-26-025905 | EDGAR |
| 2026-03-05 | 0001104659-26-024108 | EDGAR |
| 2026-02-09 | 0001104659-26-012069 | EDGAR |
| 2025-11-18 | 0001104659-25-113439 | EDGAR |
| 2025-09-10 | 0001104659-25-088830 | EDGAR |
| 2025-08-04 | 0001104659-25-073644 | EDGAR |
| 2025-07-22 | 0001104659-25-069601 | EDGAR |
| 2025-07-15 | 0001104659-25-067964 | EDGAR |
| Filing Date | Accession | Link |
|---|---|---|
| 2025-11-19 | 0000868857-25-000013 | EDGAR |
| 2024-11-19 | 0001410578-24-002030 | EDGAR |
| 2023-11-15 | 0001104659-23-118329 | EDGAR |
| 2022-11-17 | 0001104659-22-119637 | EDGAR |
| 2021-11-17 | 0001104659-21-140569 | EDGAR |
| 2020-11-19 | 0001104659-20-126988 | EDGAR |
| 2019-11-13 | 0001104659-19-063367 | EDGAR |
| 2018-11-13 | 0001047469-18-007225 | EDGAR |
| 2017-11-14 | 0001047469-17-007051 | EDGAR |
| 2016-11-16 | 0001047469-16-016739 | EDGAR |
| Filing Date | Accession | Link |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-12 | 0000868857-26-000014 | EDGAR |
| 2026-02-10 | 0000868857-26-000011 | EDGAR |
| 2025-08-05 | 0000868857-25-000009 | EDGAR |
| 2025-05-06 | 0001628280-25-022703 | EDGAR |
| 2025-02-04 | 0001628280-25-003563 | EDGAR |
| 2024-08-06 | 0001410578-24-001162 | EDGAR |
| 2024-05-07 | 0001410578-24-000608 | EDGAR |
| 2024-02-07 | 0001104659-24-011234 | EDGAR |
| 2023-08-09 | 0001104659-23-089320 | EDGAR |
| 2023-05-09 | 0001104659-23-057746 | EDGAR |
| # | ETF | Provider | Weight | $ Exposure | ETF AUM | As Of |
|---|
Quarterly filings sourced from SEC 10-Q / 10-K reports. TTM tiles aggregate the most recent four quarters; bars show the last ~12 quarters oldest → newest.
- Revenue — top-line sales. Look for consistent YoY growth; seasonal businesses need same-quarter comparisons (Q4 '24 vs Q4 '23).
- Net Income — bottom-line profit after all expenses. Can be volatile from one-time items; red bars = net loss.
- Diluted EPS — net income per share assuming options/converts are exercised. Direct input to the P/E ratio.
- Operating Cash Flow — cash generated from core operations, before capex and financing. Harder to manipulate than net income; growing OCF is a quality signal.
- Sequential growth — quarter-over-quarter trend. Accelerating bars are a momentum signal.
- YoY growth — compare to the same quarter a year earlier to remove seasonality.
- Quality — OCF should roughly track Net Income over time. Large divergence (net income ≫ OCF) flags accruals risk.
- Margins — scan the bar ratios: Net Income / Revenue tells you margin trend without needing a separate chart.
TTM (trailing-twelve-month) smooths seasonality and is used for the P/E calculation. Filings appear 30–90 days after the period closes.
| P/E Ratio | 27.9 |
| P/B Ratio | 3.4 |
| P/S Ratio | 0.5 |
| EV/EBITDA | 10.2 |
| TTM Revenue | $15.4B |
| TTM Net Income | $0.3B |
| TTM EPS | $2.18 |
| ROE | 13.1% |
| Dividend Yield | 2.40% |
| Debt/Equity | 1.24 |