ETNB 89bio, Inc. Common Stock

XNAS 14.86 Delayed
Find condors

Stock quote, options chain, IV rank, technicals, AI analysis, and institutional ownership. Iron condor setups Expected move IV rank history Fibonacci levels Insider trading

Market data may be delayed, incomplete, or inaccurate. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Verify quotes with your broker before trading. See Terms §17.

ETNB $14.86 —
Key stats
$14.86
52-Week Range
$14.74 – $14.87
IV Rank (30D)
10.22
Straddle Price
$8.03
P/C Vol Ratio
0.10
Market Cap
$2.2B
Open
$14.83
Day Range
$14.82 – $14.87
Volume
55,645,393
Prev Close
$14.84
About
Industry (SIC)
PHARMACEUTICAL PREPARATIONS (2834) · industry map
Exchange
XNAS
Market Cap
$2.2B
Employees
93
List Date
2019-11-11
CIK
0001785173
Headquarters
San Francisco, CA
Homepage
https://www.89bio.com

89bio Inc is a United States-based clinical-stage biopharmaceutical company focused on the development and commercialization of therapies for the treatment of liver and cardio-metabolic diseases. Its product candidate, pegozafermin (previously BIO89-100), a specifically engineered glycoPEGylated analog of fibroblast growth factor 21 (FGF21), is currently being developed for the treatment of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) and for the treatment of severe hypertriglyceridemia (SHTG).

Summary
—
composite
—
No summary data available for this symbol yet.

Each spoke is this symbol's rank within its sector (0–100; the dotted ring marks the sector median at 50). Higher is more constructive for a long. One spoke — News sentiment — is an absolute reading, not a sector rank. Grayed spokes have no data. A fuller shape is a summary, not a recommendation.

Chart
Seasonality
Insufficient price history — listed 2532 days ago. Seasonality patterns need at least one full year of data.
Technical Indicators

Quick-reference for reading the values below. Indicators combine to confirm a view — no single one is a trade signal on its own.

Trend Indicators
  • SMA 20 / 50 / 200 — price above = uptrend, below = downtrend. SMA 50 crossing SMA 200 is the golden/death cross.
  • EMA 12 / 26 — faster-reacting averages; 12 above 26 is short-term bullish.
  • MACD — bullish when MACD > signal (green badge), bearish when below. Divergence from price often precedes reversals.
  • ADX (14) — trend strength regardless of direction. <20 range, 20–25 weak trend, 25–50 trend, >50 strong trend.
  • +DI / −DI — +DI > −DI favors bulls; the reverse favors bears. Read alongside ADX.
Momentum Oscillators
  • RSI (14) — <30 oversold, >70 overbought. 40–60 is neutral; trending names can stay extreme.
  • Stochastic %K / %D — <20 oversold, >80 overbought. %K crossing %D is an early momentum signal.
  • Williams %R — inverted scale: <−80 oversold, >−20 overbought.

Oscillators work best in range-bound markets; in strong trends they give premature reversal signals.

Volume & Volatility
  • Bollinger Bands — price at upper band = overbought, lower = oversold. Narrow bands (squeeze) often precede expansion.
  • OBV — cumulative volume; rising OBV confirms uptrend, falling OBV confirms downtrend. Divergence from price is a warning.
  • Vol SMA 20 / Vol ROC — today's volume vs. 20-day average. Positive ROC with price move = conviction.
  • ATR / True Range — average daily $ move; sizing and stop-loss reference.
  • HV 20 / 30 / 60 — realized (historical) volatility. Compare to IV on the options cards: IV > HV = rich premium.

Confluence matters: trend + momentum + volume agreeing carries far more weight than any single indicator. For how these feed the spread scanner score, see the algorithm docs →

Trend Indicators

SMA 20: $14.81
SMA 50: $12.41
SMA 200: $9.75
Current: $14.84
EMA 12: $14.77
EMA 26: $14.21
MACD: 0.5617 | Signal: -0.1804
BULLISH
ADX (14): 55.25
STRONG TREND
+DI: 44.95
−DI: 11.57

Momentum Oscillators

RSI (14): 76.94
OVERBOUGHT
Stoch %K: 67.86
Stoch %D: 55.21
Williams %R: -23.08

Volume & Volatility

BB Upper: $14.87
BB Lower: $14.76
NEUTRAL
OBV: 89,979,452
Vol SMA 20: 6,202,283
Vol ROC: 1845.57%
ATR: $0.16
True Range: $0.05
HV 20: 4.7%
HV 30: 178.7%
HV 60: 131.3%

Data Summary

Data Points: 500
Last Updated:
Date Range: 2023-11-01T00:00:00 – 2025-10-29T00:00:00
AI Analysis

LLM Stock Analysis Report

Executive Summary

Overall Assessment: BEARISH (Confidence Level: 7/10)

Key Drivers and Primary Risks:

  • High volatility (Beta: 1.56) and recent overbought conditions (RSI: 76.94)
  • Lack of clear technical signals or catalysts
  • Recent news sentiment unknown due to lack of available data

Investment Thesis: Avoid taking a significant position in ETNB until further evidence of direction emerges.

Recent News Sentiment Impact: No recent news headlines available for analysis.

Technical Analysis

Trend Direction:

  • Short-term (1-4 weeks): NEUTRAL
  • Medium-term (1-3 months): BEARISH
  • Long-term (3-12 months): BULLISH

Support/Resistance Levels:

  • Key price levels:
    • Lower Bollinger Band: $14.76
    • Middle Bollinger Band: $14.81
    • Upper Bollinger Band: $14.87

Momentum Signals:

  • RSI interpretation: OVERBOUGHT (76.94), indicating potential for a pullback
  • MACD signal: BULLISH, but momentum is waning
  • Bollinger Bands position: NEUTRAL, indicating no clear trend

News & Sentiment Analysis

Recent Headlines Summary: No recent news headlines available.

Sentiment Assessment: Unable to assess sentiment due to lack of data.

Catalyst Identification: None identified.

Market Narrative: No clear narrative or catalysts available for analysis.

Risk & Volatility Assessment

Beta Interpretation: HIGH RISK (1.56), indicating more volatility than the market.

Volatility Regime: HIGH VOLATILITY (Stock Volatility: 1.18).

Options Market Signals: IV Rank: MEDIUM, indicating moderate levels of implied volatility.

Market Context & Positioning

Sector Performance: No specific sector performance data available for analysis.

Institutional Activity: No clear volume patterns or institutional interest signals identified.

Correlation Analysis: ETNB has an inverse correlation with the market (R-squared: 0.27).

Relative Valuation: Unable to assess relative valuation due to lack of peer company data.

Key Levels & Action Items

  • Critical Price Levels: Lower Bollinger Band ($14.76), Middle Bollinger Band ($14.81), and Upper Bollinger Band ($14.87)
  • Breakout/Breakdown Levels: None identified.
  • Time-Sensitive Catalysts: Earnings date: 2025-08-07
  • Risk Management: Consider implementing a stop-loss strategy at the Lower Bollinger Band or $14.75, depending on market conditions.

Additional Comments:

  • The lack of recent news headlines and unclear technical signals make it challenging to establish a strong investment thesis.
  • High volatility and beta suggest caution is warranted when considering a position in ETNB.
  • Further analysis may be necessary once more data becomes available, particularly if there are any changes to the company's fundamentals or market environment.
Generated
Earnings History
15 of 15 under expected move
Avg Expected Move
19.77%
Avg Actual Move
4.36%
Each row pairs the pre-earnings straddle-implied expected move with the realized close-to-close move. Sorted oldest first.
Earnings Date Timing Expected Move Actual Move Ratio Outcome
2021-05-13 After-Close 17.18% 6.19% 0.36x Within
2021-11-12 After-Close 30.59% 3.40% 0.11x Within
2022-08-11 After-Close 58.82% 6.62% 0.11x Within
2023-03-10 After-Close 32.50% 5.17% 0.16x Within
2023-05-04 After-Close 12.00% 3.16% 0.26x Within
2023-08-09 After-Close 10.07% 3.34% 0.33x Within
2023-11-09 After-Close 8.51% 2.36% 0.28x Within
2024-02-29 After-Close 19.01% 10.03% 0.53x Within
2024-05-09 After-Close 12.40% 4.39% 0.35x Within
2024-08-05 After-Close 15.49% 5.36% 0.35x Within
2024-11-07 After-Close 7.28% 4.92% 0.68x Within
2025-01-13 After-Close 27.34% 0.48% 0.02x Within
2025-02-27 After-Close 15.83% 0.97% 0.06x Within
2025-05-01 After-Close 15.38% 7.38% 0.48x Within
2025-08-07 After-Close 14.14% 1.61% 0.11x Within

Earnings calendar: this week’s reports with expected vs actual moves →

ETNB Options Activity & IV Rank

ETNB IV rank history, 52-week IV rank and IV percentile →

Volatility Metrics

Current IV: 41.0%
7-DTE IV: —
Expected Move: $8.03
7-DTE Move: $8.03
Days to Exp: 23 (2025-11-21)

Options Flow

Call Volume: 19,817
Put Volume: 2,037
P/C Volume: 0.103
BULLISH
Call OI: 3,866
Put OI: 36,462
P/C OI: 9.431
Total OI: 40,328

ATM Options Pricing

ATM Call: $7.50
ATM Put: $0.53
Call %: 50.5%
Put %: 3.5%

Chain Summary

Chain Volume: 48,737
Chain OI: 126,024
Last Updated: 10/29/2025
Spread Scanner GPU
Full Algorithm Docs ↗

Each spread is ranked by a composite score built in three stages. Full documentation →

Stage 1 — Base Score (GPU scanner)

score = P(profit) × (credit / spread_width)
P(profit) from short leg delta (1 − |delta|), penalised above 85%. Credit uses mid-price to handle illiquid chains fairly.

Stage 2 — Skew Adjustment (±25% cap)

RR and BF (30-delta) from the persisted per-symbol skew snapshot — wing strikes picked by real greeks.delta, not a moneyness proxy. Put skew boosts bull puts, penalises bear calls. High butterfly boosts iron condors. Calendars are skew-neutral.

Stage 3 — Technical Overlay (±50% cap, 5 groups)
Group 1 · Directional Bias (±0.25)
  • RSI <40 bullish / >60 bearish
  • MACD crossover + histogram trend
  • Price vs SMA 50 & SMA 200
Group 2 · Momentum (±0.10)
  • Stochastic %K <20 / >80
  • Williams %R <−80 / >−20
Group 3 · Volatility (up to −0.25 / +0.15)
  • Blended ATR + straddle expected-move penalty
  • Bollinger Band signal (+ counter-trend penalty)
  • BB width — vol contraction boost for ICs
Group 4 · IV Regime (±0.15)
  • IV rank ≥ 75 → strong boost for credit spreads
  • IV rank < 25 → penalty (selling cheap vol)
Group 5 · Liquidity (penalty up to −0.10)
  • Min open interest across all legs
  • OI < 100 → −0.10 · OI < 500 → −0.05

score = base_score × skew_multiplier × tech_multiplier
Both multipliers are shown per spread. Beta is informational only — ATR already captures realized vol. Full algorithm documentation →

Enter a ticker to scan for optimal spread opportunities.

Evaluates all bull put, bear call, iron condor, and calendar spread combinations using GPU-accelerated analysis.

Dealer Positioning
HIGH γ vs HISTORY

Estimated net dealer gamma is at the 98th percentile of this name's own daily history, near the high end of its range. This describes current positioning; it is not a forecast or a trading signal.

Gamma percentile
98%
vs own history
GEX tilt
+0.16
OI-weighted, today
Vanna tilt
+0.95
δ-sensitivity to IV
Charm tilt
-0.86
δ-decay vs time
Vanna tilt +0.95: the estimated dealer exposure leans positive, so the modeled hedge would shift noticeably if implied volatility changed.
Charm tilt -0.86: the estimated dealer exposure leans negative, so the modeled hedge would shift noticeably as time passes and options approach expiry.

Net dealer gamma is an estimate of the aggregate gamma held by options market makers across this name's option chain, weighted by open interest. Dealer positions aren't public, so it uses a standard simplifying assumption: dealers are treated as long the calls and short the puts that are open. Actual dealer books can differ.

Gamma percentile ranks today's estimate against this name's own daily history, from 0% (the lowest reading on record) to 100% (the highest). Raw gamma scales with how much open interest a chain carries, so it isn't comparable across names; the percentile is. The badge marks the bottom 20% as low and the top 20% as high.

Tilts run from −1 to +1 and show how lopsided the estimated dealer exposure is. GEX tilt compares call gamma with put gamma. Vanna tilt describes how the hedge would shift if implied volatility changed, and charm tilt how it would shift with the passage of time.

This card describes estimated positioning and where it sits historically. It is not a forecast of price direction or volatility and not a trading signal. Market-wide view: Dealer positioning screener.

· 8 ATM contracts, 67k total OI
Skew (Wing IV − ATM IV)
DTE:
Wing Δ:
Metric:
Wing vs ATM
IV(put wing) − IV(ATM), in vol points

How much the OTM put trades above (or below) the at-the-money strike. Measures the height of the put-side tail relative to ATM — i.e. how expensive crash insurance is on this name.

  • Positive (typical) — wing IV > ATM IV. Standard equity put skew: portfolios bid up crash protection, so OTM puts trade richer than ATM.
  • Near zero or negative (unusual) — wing IV ≤ ATM IV. Flat or inverted put side. Common when there's no fear demand, in tightly mean-reverting names, or right after an earnings catalyst clears.
  • Percentile vs own 3-yr history: high = wings rich (good time to sell wing premium); low = wings cheap (good time to buy protection).
  • Not directional — high or low wings don't predict up or down moves. It's a price tag on tail insurance, not a forecast.
Risk Reversal
IV(call wing) − IV(put wing), equal delta on each side

Which side of the smile is the market paying up for? Measures the tilt of the surface — call skew vs put skew at matched deltas.

  • Negative (typical) — puts richer than calls. Standard equity behavior: hedging demand makes puts carry a premium. Most large-caps sit in the −1 to −5 vol-point range.
  • Strongly negative (< −5 pts) — heavy downside hedging, elevated fear, or an upcoming catalyst (earnings, FDA, macro event). Worth flagging.
  • Positive — calls richer than puts. Unusual for equities; signals bullish momentum, short-squeeze positioning, or takeover/M&A speculation.
  • Near zero — symmetric surface. Market sees roughly equal up/down risk. Rare for large-caps; more common in commodities and FX.
Reading them together

Wing-vs-ATM tells you how expensive the tails are. Risk Reversal tells you which side is favored. Combined:

  • High wing percentile + deeply negative RR → strong put bid; stress or major event priced in. Owning protection costs a premium; selling put premium is dangerous.
  • Low wing percentile + near-zero RR → complacency; insurance cheap and balanced. Good environment to add cheap downside hedges.
  • Positive RR + elevated wings → call-side fear-of-missing-out; common in squeeze setups. Upside calls expensive, downside puts not bid.
14 DTE / 10d —
— pts EXTREME
as of Oct 27 · No data
30 DTE / 10d —
+237.5 pts EXTREME
as of Oct 27 · ATM 29.1% / Wing 266.6%

Percentile is the rank of today's reading within ~3 years of this symbol's own history. High percentile = wings are rich relative to history; not a directional signal. Skew is read off the chain in real time, not from CBOE SKEW.

Volatility Surface

Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility surface.

Volatility Smile

Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility smile.

IV Rank (7 DTE)
IV Rank (30 DTE)10.2LowOct 29
Straddle Price (30 DTE)$8.03Oct 29
Beta Analysis
Insufficient price history — listed 2532 days ago. Beta and correlation vs SPY require ~1 year of daily returns to be statistically meaningful.

ETNB Institutional Ownership (13F)

Latest filings — 2025-09-30

Institutional managers with $100M+ AUM file Form 13F-HR quarterly, due 45 days after quarter end. Holdings are reported gross at quarter-end market value — they are a snapshot, not a real-time position.

  • Shares — long equity positions in this name, aggregated across share classes.
  • Calls / Puts — notional value of long call / put exposure where this ticker is the underlying.
  • % of Float — holder's reported shares divided by the latest diluted shares outstanding. Sums above 100% indicate large custodian / prime broker positions where the same shares are reported by multiple filers.
  • Custodian badge — filers with more than 5,000 holdings are typically broker-dealers / custodians reporting customer-held shares, not active managers.

Each filer is counted once at its latest 13F-HR filing. New filings are ingested on a weekly cadence.

3 filers71,278 shares$1.05M value
# Filer Shares Value % of Total % of Float Period
1 Point72 Asia (Singapore) Pte. Ltd. 66,898 $983.40K 93.86% — 2025-09-30
2 Point72 (DIFC) Ltd 3,987 $58.61K 5.59% — 2025-09-30
3 Point72 Europe (London) LLP 393 $5.78K 0.55% — 2025-09-30
# Filer Notional Value % of Total Period
1 filers$208.74K notional
# Filer Notional Value % of Total Period
1 Wolverine Trading, LLC Custodian $208.74K 100.00% 2025-09-30

ETNB Insider Trading (Form 4)

Latest: 2025-10-30
Form 4 filings — insider beneficial-ownership changes by officers, directors, and 10%+ holders. Filed within 2 business days of transaction.
Filed Reporter Role Action Shares Avg Price Net $ Link
2025-10-30 Edward Morrow Atkinson III Director Disp (D) −148,950 opt — EDGAR
2025-10-30 Martin Babler Director Disp (D) −124,100 opt — EDGAR
2025-10-30 Quoc Le-Nguyen See Remarks Mixed −315,378 — EDGAR
2025-10-30 Steven Altschuler Director Disp (D) −213,450 opt — EDGAR
2025-10-30 Charles McWherter Director U −25,000 — EDGAR
2025-10-30 Michael R Hayden Director U −246,420 — EDGAR
2025-10-30 Francis Willard Sarena Chief Operating Officer U −75,310 — EDGAR
2025-10-30 Derek DiRocco Director Disp (D) −180,450 opt — EDGAR
2025-10-30 Rohan Palekar Chief Executive Officer Mixed −809,273 — EDGAR
2025-10-30 Harry H Mansbach Chief Medical Officer Mixed −302,656 — EDGAR
2025-10-30 Ryan Martins Chief Financial Officer Mixed −339,295 — EDGAR
2025-10-30 Lota S. Zoth Director Disp (D) −186,450 opt — EDGAR
2025-10-30 Kathleen Laporte Director Disp (D) −166,450 opt — EDGAR
2025-10-23 Ryan Martins Chief Financial Officer Exer (M) +80,799 $3.17 $256.5K EDGAR
2025-08-05 Quoc Le-Nguyen See Remarks Tax (F) −8,202 $9.16 -$75.1K EDGAR
Codes: P = open-market purchase · S = open-market sale · A = grant/award · M = option exercise · F = tax withholding at vest · G = bona-fide gift · D = disposition to issuer · J = other (described in filing footnote — typically 401(k), trust, inheritance) · W = will/inheritance. Only P / S codes carry directional signal.

ETNB Insider Holdings

5 insiders · @ $14.84
Officers, directors, and 10%+ owners who have filed a Form 4 in the past two years, ranked by current disclosed exposure (shares × today's price). Shares are direct + indirect (via trusts / LLCs / spouse). Excludes unvested RSU and option grants — those aren't beneficially owned until vest.
# Insider Role Shares Disclosed Exposure Lifetime OM Net Filings Last Filed
1 Rajeev M. Shah Director 4,965,769 $73.69M $31.91M 5 2024-11-18
2 Peter Kolchinsky Director 1,500,000 $22.26M $96.00M 2 2025-02-05
3 Ryan Martins Chief Financial Officer 374,295 $5.55M -$638.8K 33 2025-10-30
4 RA Capital Nexus Fund, L.P. Director 335,364 $4.98M $300.00M 3 2025-02-03
5 Edward Morrow Atkinson III Director 6,250 $92.8K -$247.9K 7 2025-10-30
Lifetime OM Net = signed sum of open-market buys (P) and sells (S) over their career; excludes grants, tax withholdings, and dispositions to issuer. A large negative number is normal for long-tenured executives — they've sold compensation grants over many years.

ETNB Proposed Insider Sales (Form 144)

Latest: 2025-07-15
Last 30d: 0 filings  ·  Last 90d: 0 filings

What is Form 144? A notice of intent to sell restricted or control stock under Rule 144. Affiliates (officers, directors, 10%+ owners) and holders of restricted shares must file Form 144 when planning to sell more than 5,000 shares or $50,000 in any 3-month rolling window.

How it relates to Form 4: Form 144 is filed before the trade (up to 90 days in advance); Form 4 is filed within 2 business days after the trade executes. Not every Form 144 results in a sale — the filer may cancel or delay. Look for the corresponding Form 4 on the Insider Activity card to confirm a sale actually happened.

10b5-1 plans: Trades made under a pre-scheduled Rule 10b5-1 plan are not discretionary — they execute automatically on dates set months earlier, regardless of news. High 10b5-1 percentages mean less per-filing signal value, though cumulative selling volume still matters.

"Notice value": Aggregate market value the filer wrote into the Form 144 — i.e. the size of the planned sale, not necessarily the executed dollars. An amended notice (Form 144/A) replaces the original it amends, and cancelled notices are dropped, so neither is double-counted above. A filed value that is clearly inconsistent with the share count at the stock's price (a filer typo) shows as a dash and is left out of the totals.

Source & freshness: Sourced from public Form 144 filings. Refreshed daily; new filings typically appear here the morning after they are filed.

Filed Filer Role Shares Notice Value Planned Sale Broker Plan Link
2025-07-15 QUOC LE-NGUYEN Officer 10,461 $115.2K 2025-07-15 Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC … 10b5-1 EDGAR
2025-04-15 QUOC LE-NGUYEN Officer 15,329 $91.2K 2025-04-15 Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC … 10b5-1 EDGAR
2025-01-15 QUOC LE-NGUYEN Officer 10,963 $71.1K 2025-01-15 Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC … 10b5-1 EDGAR
2024-10-30 QUOC LE-NGUYEN Officer 27,955 $227.0K 2024-10-30 Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC … 10b5-1 EDGAR
2024-04-01 ROHAN PALEKAR Officer, Director 52,718 $574.9K 2024-04-01 Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC … 10b5-1 EDGAR
2024-02-26 ROHAN PALEKAR Officer, Director 4,477 $48.2K 2024-02-26 Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC … 10b5-1 EDGAR
2023-12-29 ROHAN PALEKAR Officer, Director 50,000 $560.0K 2023-12-29 Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC … 10b5-1 EDGAR
2023-07-17 LAPORTE KATHLEEN Director 12,500 $235.0K 2023-07-17 ETRADE FINANCIAL CORPORATION — EDGAR
2023-06-05 ROHAN PALEKAR Officer, Director 15,000 $300.0K 2023-06-05 E*TRADE FINANCIAL CORPORATION 10b5-1 EDGAR
2023-06-01 EDWARD M ATKINSON Director 6,250 $112.0K 2023-06-01 E*TRADE FINANCIAL CORPORATION 10b5-1 EDGAR
Notice value is the aggregate market value the filer states they intend to sell — not a confirmed transaction. Compare to Insider Activity (Form 4) to see which planned sales actually executed. Market-wide feed: Planned sales (Form 144).
ETF Holders
# ETF Provider Weight $ Exposure ETF AUM As Of
Fundamentals

Quarterly filings sourced from SEC 10-Q / 10-K reports. TTM tiles aggregate the most recent four quarters; bars show the last ~12 quarters oldest → newest.

Metrics
  • Revenue — top-line sales. Look for consistent YoY growth; seasonal businesses need same-quarter comparisons (Q4 '24 vs Q4 '23).
  • Net Income — bottom-line profit after all expenses. Can be volatile from one-time items; red bars = net loss.
  • Diluted EPS — net income per share assuming options/converts are exercised. Direct input to the P/E ratio.
  • Operating Cash Flow — cash generated from core operations, before capex and financing. Harder to manipulate than net income; growing OCF is a quality signal.
How to read the bars
  • Sequential growth — quarter-over-quarter trend. Accelerating bars are a momentum signal.
  • YoY growth — compare to the same quarter a year earlier to remove seasonality.
  • Quality — OCF should roughly track Net Income over time. Large divergence (net income ≫ OCF) flags accruals risk.
  • Margins — scan the bar ratios: Net Income / Revenue tells you margin trend without needing a separate chart.

TTM (trailing-twelve-month) smooths seasonality and is used for the P/E calculation. Filings appear 30–90 days after the period closes.

Trailing P/E
—
TTM Diluted EPS
—
TTM Revenue
—
TTM Net Income
—
TTM Op. Cash Flow
—
Short Interest & Float

Regulatory short-interest reports publish on a bi-weekly settlement cadence; short-volume is reported daily by the trade-reporting facilities. Float is derived from insider-ownership filings.

Metric definitions
  • Short Interest — total shares currently sold short as of the settlement date. Lags real time by ~8 business days.
  • SI % of Float — short interest / free float. The key crowding metric.
  • Days to Cover — short interest / avg daily volume. How many full trading days it would take shorts to buy back. High DTC + catalyst = squeeze fuel.
  • Short Vol Ratio — today's short-sale volume / total volume. Intraday selling pressure proxy (not the same as short interest).
  • Free Float — shares available for public trading (total shares minus insider / restricted).
  • Float % — free float / shares outstanding. <50% = tightly held, more prone to squeezes.
How to read the signals
  • SI % of Float < 5% — typical, no particular signal.
  • 5–15% — elevated; watch for catalysts (earnings, guidance, macro).
  • 15–30% — heavily shorted; tight-float names in this range have produced notable squeezes historically.
  • >30% — extreme; borrow is likely expensive and squeeze risk is material.
  • Days to Cover > 5 combined with high SI% amplifies squeeze potential.
History chart
  • Trend matters more than level. Rapidly rising short interest often precedes negative catalysts or heavy hedging.
  • A sudden drop in SI after a rally may indicate a squeeze in progress.

Short interest is reported mid-month and end-of-month; short volume is daily.

Short Interest
6.77M
SI % of Float
4.56%
Days to Cover
1.93
Short Vol Ratio
20.0%
Free Float
—
Float %
—
Short interest 2025-10-15 • Short volume 2025-10-29