Hyliion Holdings Corp.(HYLN)
Stock quote, options chain, IV rank, technicals, AI analysis, and institutional ownership.
Market data may be delayed, incomplete, or inaccurate. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Verify quotes with your broker before trading. See Terms §17.
- 52-Week Range
- $1.56 – $8.49
- YTD
- +131.87%
- IV Rank (30D)
- 63.4
- Straddle Price
- $0.78
- P/C Vol Ratio
- 0.38
- Market Cap
- $0.8B
A blended fair-value estimate combining up to six valuation methods. Each method is weighted by how well it fits the company — DCF down-weights for unprofitable names; DDM only fires for steady dividend payers; comparables down-weight when peer multiples disagree.
- DCF (quality-aware) — projects free cash flow with a horizon that scales to business quality. True compounders (quality 6/6) get 10 years explicit + 10 years fade before terminal; cyclical/struggling names (quality 0-1) get a 5-year terminal cliff. Quality is scored from ROE, gross margin, growth, FCF margin, debt load, and FCF consistency — the same factors that drive market premium for compounders.
- Market-Implied Growth (in Model Inputs) — reverse-DCF that answers "what growth rate is the market pricing in?". Lets you sanity-check the deviation: if implied growth is plausible for the business, the model's bearish flag may be wrong; if implausible, the market may be over-extrapolating.
- DDM (Gordon Growth Dividend Model) — values the stream of future dividends. Only used when trailing yield ≥ 2% and dividend payments are stable — below that the dividend is a token payout and Gordon (which values only the dividend stream) systematically underprices growth names, so those route to DCF + comparables + market anchor instead.
- P/E, EV/EBITDA, P/B, P/S — applies the peer-group median multiple to this company's per-share metric. Peers come from the same set as the "Related symbols" card. Earnings/sales metrics are forward-tilted by the company's recent revenue growth (capped at 25%) so they're comparable to peers' growth-embedded multiples — mimics how analysts use NTM rather than TTM. Per-multiple weights are biased by company quality (e.g. P/B down-weighted for asset-light tech).
- Market Anchor (SMA50) — the 50-day moving average, weighted by recent trading-range stability (tighter Bollinger bands → higher weight). Captures information fundamentals miss (forward consensus, sentiment, supply/demand) — but only when recent trading is steady enough that the market has converged on a view. During wild breakouts or breakdowns the anchor's weight collapses.
- Options Expected (B-L 30d) — the risk-neutral expected stock price at 30-day options expiration, derived from the full implied-volatility surface via Breeden-Litzenberger (second derivative of call price wrt strike → implied PDF, then E[S_T]). Forward-looking, captures all options-implied information (smile, skew, term structure) in one number. Weighted by chain liquidity. SP500-only at present (pre-computed daily). Backtest evidence: adds modest alpha across most bucket × holding combos.
- Blended value — weighted average. Confidence reflects how many methods fired and how tight peer dispersion is.
- Deviation pill — green when blended FV ≥ 10% above current price (undervalued); red when ≥ 10% below; grey otherwise.
| 10-yr Treasury (rf) | 4.96% |
| Beta vs SPY | 1.68 |
| Cost of Equity (CAPM) | 14.19% (VRP-adj) |
| WACC | 14.05% |
| Volatility Risk Premium | +153.7pp (IV − HV30), ERP adj +50bps |
| Effective Tax Rate | 21.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY, DCF input) | +30.0% |
| DCF Horizon | 10 years explicit + fade |
| Forward Tilt (NTM/TTM) | ×1.10 (applied to P/E, EV/EBITDA, P/S) |
| Free Cash Flow (TTM) | $-0.1B |
| Return on Equity (TTM) | -30.8% |
| Book / Price | 24.6% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 6.3% |
| FCF Margin (TTM) | -973.1% |
| Debt / Equity | 0.00 |
| Quality Score | 2/6 — normal (10y DCF) |
| SMA 50 | $3.79 (Market Anchor value) |
| SMA 20 / Bollinger Mid | $3.87 |
| Bollinger Width / SMA20 | 815.4% (drives anchor stability) |
| Net Debt | $-0.0B |
| Market Cap | $1B |
| Method | Implied Price | Weight | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| DCF | n/a | 0% | |
| DDM (Gordon) | n/a | 0% | |
| Peer P/E | n/a | 0% | median 28.5× · 4 peers |
| Peer EV/EBITDA | n/a | 0% | median 13.2× · 5 peers |
| Peer P/B | $2.38 | 19% | median 2.3× · 8 peers |
| Peer P/S | $0.07 | 19% | median 1.9× · 8 peers |
| Market Anchor (SMA50) | $3.79 | 61% | stability 61% (BB-width) |
| Options Expected (B-L 30d) | $4.00 | 0% | 6 strikes · skew +0.17 |
- Industry (SIC)
- TRUCK & BUS BODIES (3713)
- Exchange
- XASE
- Market Cap
- $0.8B
Hyliion Holdings Corp designs and develops power generators for stationary and mobile applications and provides R&D service. It provides solutions that enable clean, flexible, and affordable electricity production. The company focuses on delivering distributed power generators that can operate on various fuel sources to future-proof against an ever-changing energy economy. In addition to stationary power solutions, it focuses on mobile applications, including vehicles and marine technologies. Its products and services include: KARNO Power Modules which is a modular, fully enclosed, fuel-agnost…
Each spoke is this symbol's rank within its sector (0–100; the dotted ring marks the sector median at 50). Higher is more constructive for a long. One spoke — News sentiment — is an absolute reading, not a sector rank. Grayed spokes have no data. A fuller shape is a summary, not a recommendation.
| Month | Avg Return | Years of Data |
|---|---|---|
| Jan | +9.56% | 6 |
| Feb | +4.20% | 6 |
| Mar | -9.03% | 6 |
| Apr | -16.09% | 6 |
| May | +55.94% | 6 |
| Jun | -5.13% | 6 |
| Jul | +5.00% | 6 |
| Aug | -11.09% | 6 |
| Sep | +9.56% | 6 |
| Oct | -7.27% | 5 |
| Nov | +4.98% | 5 |
| Dec | -1.24% | 5 |
Quick-reference for reading the values below. Indicators combine to confirm a view — no single one is a trade signal on its own.
- SMA 20 / 50 / 200 — price above = uptrend, below = downtrend. SMA 50 crossing SMA 200 is the golden/death cross.
- EMA 12 / 26 — faster-reacting averages; 12 above 26 is short-term bullish.
- MACD — bullish when MACD > signal (green badge), bearish when below. Divergence from price often precedes reversals.
- ADX (14) — trend strength regardless of direction. <20 range, 20–25 weak trend, 25–50 trend, >50 strong trend.
- +DI / −DI — +DI > −DI favors bulls; the reverse favors bears. Read alongside ADX.
- RSI (14) — <30 oversold, >70 overbought. 40–60 is neutral; trending names can stay extreme.
- Stochastic %K / %D — <20 oversold, >80 overbought. %K crossing %D is an early momentum signal.
- Williams %R — inverted scale: <−80 oversold, >−20 overbought.
Oscillators work best in range-bound markets; in strong trends they give premature reversal signals.
- Bollinger Bands — price at upper band = overbought, lower = oversold. Narrow bands (squeeze) often precede expansion.
- OBV — cumulative volume; rising OBV confirms uptrend, falling OBV confirms downtrend. Divergence from price is a warning.
- Vol SMA 20 / Vol ROC — today's volume vs. 20-day average. Positive ROC with price move = conviction.
- ATR / True Range — average daily $ move; sizing and stop-loss reference.
- HV 20 / 30 / 60 — realized (historical) volatility. Compare to IV on the options cards: IV > HV = rich premium.
Confluence matters: trend + momentum + volume agreeing carries far more weight than any single indicator. For how these feed the spread scanner score, see the algorithm docs →
Trend Indicators
Momentum Oscillators
Volume & Volatility
Data Summary
LLM Stock Analysis Report - HYLN
Executive Summary
Overall Assessment: BEARISH (Confidence Level: 7/10)
Key Drivers:
- Bearish sentiment from recent news headlines
- High volatility, indicating high risk
- Negative beta (2.88) relative to the market, suggesting inverse correlation
Primary Risks:
- Unusually high IV premium compared to historical volatility, indicating potential for further price fluctuations
- Recent negative news headlines may continue to weigh on the stock price
Investment Thesis: HYLN is experiencing a significant decline due to negative news sentiment and high volatility. While there are some bullish technical signals, the overall bearish sentiment and risk profile suggest caution.
Recent News Sentiment Impact: The recent wave of negative news headlines has had a significant impact on HYLN's stock price, contributing to its current downtrend.
Technical Analysis
Trend Direction: Short-term (1-4 weeks): Bearish; Medium-term (1-3 months): Neutral; Long-term (3-12 months): Bullish
Support/Resistance Levels:
- Lower Bollinger Band: $3.05
- Middle Line: $3.64
- Upper Bollinger Band: $4.23
Momentum Signals:
- RSI Interpretation: Neutral (57.73), not indicating overbought or oversold conditions
- MACD Signal: Bearish (Histogram -0.16)
- Bollinger Bands Position: Squeeze, indicating potential for further price movements
News & Sentiment Analysis
Recent Headlines Summary: All recent news headlines are negative, focusing on investor alerts and securities class actions.
Sentiment Assessment: Overall sentiment is NEGATIVE, driven by the sheer number of negative news headlines.
Catalyst Identification: No upcoming events or earnings releases have been identified that could significantly impact HYLN's stock price in the short term.
Market Narrative: The recent negative news headlines have created a bearish market narrative, which may continue to influence the stock price.
Risk & Volatility Assessment
Beta Interpretation: High risk relative to the market (beta 2.88), suggesting inverse correlation and potential for significant price movements.
Volatility Regime: Current volatility is higher than historical levels, indicating a high-risk environment.
Options Market Signals:
- IV Rank: Medium (38.5%)
- Put/Call Volume Ratio: Bullish (0.25)
- Options market pricing a $1.02 move by expiration, indicating potential for further price fluctuations
Market Context & Positioning
Sector Performance: HYLN's sector performance is neutral, suggesting no significant impact from broader market trends.
Institutional Activity: Institutional interest is low, with a put/call ratio of 0.25 and an IV premium that is higher than historical volatility.
Correlation Analysis: HYLN's correlation to the market (R-squared) is relatively low at 0.36, indicating limited influence from broader market trends.
Relative Valuation: HYLN is trading within its historical range, suggesting no significant relative value opportunities.
Key Levels & Action Items
Critical Price Levels:
- Lower Bollinger Band: $3.05 (support)
- Middle Line: $3.64 (resistance)
- Upper Bollinger Band: $4.23 (resistance)
Breakout/Breakdown Levels: None identified, as the stock is experiencing a significant decline.
Time-Sensitive Catalysts: No time-sensitive catalysts have been identified that could significantly impact HYLN's stock price in the short term.
Risk Management: Stop-loss levels should be set at $3.05 (support) to manage risk, considering the high volatility and bearish sentiment.
| Earnings Date | Timing | Expected Move | Actual Move | Ratio | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-14 | After-Close | 17.05% | 4.55% | 0.27x | Within |
| 2025-02-25 | After-Close | 23.22% | 0.03% | 0.00x | Within |
| 2025-05-13 | After-Close | 9.23% | 17.15% | 1.86x | Exceeded |
| 2025-08-12 | Pre-Market | 14.33% | 8.28% | 0.58x | Within |
| 2025-11-12 | Pre-Market | 17.36% | 12.04% | 0.69x | Within |
| 2026-02-25 | Pre-Market | 18.75% | 3.76% | 0.20x | Within |
| 2026-05-12 | Pre-Market | 17.34% | 0.36% | 0.02x | Within |
| 2026-08-11 | Pre-Market | 17.81% | 0.25% | 0.01x | Within |
- IV Rank (30D)
- 63.4
- IV Rank (7D)
- 63.4
- Avg IV
- 242.9%
- Straddle (30D)
- $0.78
- Straddle (7D)
- $0.78
- P/C Volume
- 0.38
Each spread is ranked by a composite score built in three stages. Full documentation →
score = P(profit) × (credit / spread_width)
P(profit) from short leg delta (1 − |delta|), penalised above 85%. Credit uses mid-price to handle illiquid chains fairly.
RR and BF (30-delta) from the persisted per-symbol skew snapshot — wing strikes picked by real greeks.delta, not a moneyness proxy. Put skew boosts bull puts, penalises bear calls. High butterfly boosts iron condors. Calendars are skew-neutral.
- RSI <40 bullish / >60 bearish
- MACD crossover + histogram trend
- Price vs SMA 50 & SMA 200
- Stochastic %K <20 / >80
- Williams %R <−80 / >−20
- Blended ATR + straddle expected-move penalty
- Bollinger Band signal (+ counter-trend penalty)
- BB width — vol contraction boost for ICs
- IV rank ≥ 75 → strong boost for credit spreads
- IV rank < 25 → penalty (selling cheap vol)
- Min open interest across all legs
- OI < 100 → −0.10 · OI < 500 → −0.05
score = base_score × skew_multiplier × tech_multiplier
Both multipliers are shown per spread. Beta is informational only — ATR already captures realized vol. Full algorithm documentation →
Enter a ticker to scan for optimal spread opportunities.
Evaluates all bull put, bear call, iron condor, and calendar spread combinations using GPU-accelerated analysis.
IV(put wing) − IV(ATM), in vol pointsHow much the OTM put trades above (or below) the at-the-money strike. Measures the height of the put-side tail relative to ATM — i.e. how expensive crash insurance is on this name.
- Positive (typical) — wing IV > ATM IV. Standard equity put skew: portfolios bid up crash protection, so OTM puts trade richer than ATM.
- Near zero or negative (unusual) — wing IV ≤ ATM IV. Flat or inverted put side. Common when there's no fear demand, in tightly mean-reverting names, or right after an earnings catalyst clears.
- Percentile vs own 3-yr history: high = wings rich (good time to sell wing premium); low = wings cheap (good time to buy protection).
- Not directional — high or low wings don't predict up or down moves. It's a price tag on tail insurance, not a forecast.
IV(call wing) − IV(put wing), equal delta on each sideWhich side of the smile is the market paying up for? Measures the tilt of the surface — call skew vs put skew at matched deltas.
- Negative (typical) — puts richer than calls. Standard equity behavior: hedging demand makes puts carry a premium. Most large-caps sit in the −1 to −5 vol-point range.
- Strongly negative (< −5 pts) — heavy downside hedging, elevated fear, or an upcoming catalyst (earnings, FDA, macro event). Worth flagging.
- Positive — calls richer than puts. Unusual for equities; signals bullish momentum, short-squeeze positioning, or takeover/M&A speculation.
- Near zero — symmetric surface. Market sees roughly equal up/down risk. Rare for large-caps; more common in commodities and FX.
Wing-vs-ATM tells you how expensive the tails are. Risk Reversal tells you which side is favored. Combined:
- High wing percentile + deeply negative RR → strong put bid; stress or major event priced in. Owning protection costs a premium; selling put premium is dangerous.
- Low wing percentile + near-zero RR → complacency; insurance cheap and balanced. Good environment to add cheap downside hedges.
- Positive RR + elevated wings → call-side fear-of-missing-out; common in squeeze setups. Upside calls expensive, downside puts not bid.
Percentile is the rank of today's reading within ~3 years of this symbol's own history. High percentile = wings are rich relative to history; not a directional signal. Skew is read off the chain in real time, not from CBOE SKEW.
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility surface.
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility smile.
- Beta (1Y vs SPY)
- 2.88
- Correlation (SPY)
- 36.2%
- R²
- 0.13
- Ann. Volatility
- 103.2%
- SPY Volatility
- 13.0%
High volatility - stock moves more than market
Institutional managers with $100M+ AUM file Form 13F-HR quarterly, due 45 days after quarter end. Holdings are reported gross at quarter-end market value — they are a snapshot, not a real-time position.
- Shares — long equity positions in this name, aggregated across share classes.
- Calls / Puts — notional value of long call / put exposure where this ticker is the underlying.
- % of Float — holder's reported shares divided by the latest diluted shares outstanding. Sums above 100% indicate large custodian / prime broker positions where the same shares are reported by multiple filers.
- Custodian badge — filers with more than 5,000 holdings are typically broker-dealers / custodians reporting customer-held shares, not active managers.
Each filer is counted once at its latest 13F-HR filing. New filings are ingested on a weekly cadence.
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | JANE STREET GROUP, LLC Custodian | $4.36M | 27.96% | 2026-06-30 |
| 2 | PEAK6 LLC | $2.55M | 16.36% | 2026-06-30 |
| 3 | IMC-Chicago, LLC Custodian | $2.46M | 15.79% | 2026-06-30 |
| 4 | SUSQUEHANNA INTERNATIONAL GROUP, LLP Custodian | $2.19M | 14.07% | 2026-06-30 |
| 5 | GROUP ONE TRADING LLC Custodian | $1.84M | 11.79% | 2026-06-30 |
| 6 | CITADEL ADVISORS LLC Custodian | $1.02M | 6.53% | 2026-06-30 |
| 7 | Vontobel Holding Ltd. | $379.81K | 2.44% | 2026-06-30 |
| 8 | SIMPLEX TRADING, LLC Custodian | $336.57K | 2.16% | 2026-06-30 |
| 9 | SIG BROKERAGE, LP | $208.40K | 1.34% | 2026-06-30 |
| 10 | SUMMIT SECURITIES GROUP LLC | $156.30K | 1.00% | 2026-06-30 |
| 11 | WOLVERINE TRADING, LLC Custodian | $85.24K | 0.55% | 2025-09-30 |
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | SUSQUEHANNA INTERNATIONAL GROUP, LLP Custodian | $2.10M | 44.49% | 2026-06-30 |
| 2 | IMC-Chicago, LLC Custodian | $1.08M | 22.81% | 2026-06-30 |
| 3 | JANE STREET GROUP, LLC Custodian | $557.47K | 11.81% | 2026-06-30 |
| 4 | CITADEL ADVISORS LLC Custodian | $468.38K | 9.93% | 2026-06-30 |
| 5 | GROUP ONE TRADING LLC Custodian | $332.92K | 7.06% | 2026-06-30 |
| 6 | SIMPLEX TRADING, LLC Custodian | $158.91K | 3.37% | 2026-06-30 |
| 7 | WOLVERINE TRADING, LLC Custodian | $25.45K | 0.54% | 2025-09-30 |
| Filed | Reporter | Role | Action | Shares | Avg Price | Net $ | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-09-22 | Jose Miguel Oxholm | Chief Legal&Compliance Officer | Gift (G) | −50,000 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-08-27 | Vincent T. Cubbage | Director | Buy (P) | +50,000 | $3.40 | $170.0K | EDGAR |
| 2026-08-25 | Thomas J. Healy | Chief Executive Officer | Other (J) | −29,840 | $3.33 | -$99.4K | EDGAR |
| 2026-08-21 | GOVINDARAJ RAMASAMY | Chief Commercial Officer | Other (J) | −6,670 | $3.37 | -$22.5K | EDGAR |
| 2026-08-21 | Greg Standley | Chief Accounting Officer. | Other (J) | −3,731 | $3.73 | -$13.9K | EDGAR |
| 2026-08-21 | Jon Panzer | Chief Financial Officer | Other (J) | −13,595 | $3.32 | -$45.1K | EDGAR |
| 2026-08-21 | Jose Miguel Oxholm | Chief Legal&Compliance Officer | Other (J) | −11,980 | $3.33 | -$39.9K | EDGAR |
| 2026-08-21 | JOSHUA T. MOOK | Chief Technology Officer | Other (J) | −10,700 | $3.33 | -$35.6K | EDGAR |
| 2026-05-27 | Vincent T. Cubbage | Director | Gift (G) | −11,500 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-05-21 | Jose Miguel Oxholm | Chief Legal&Compliance Officer | Other (J) | −11,576 | $4.02 | -$46.6K | EDGAR |
| 2026-05-21 | Greg Standley | Chief Accounting Officer. | Other (J) | −3,981 | $4.05 | -$16.1K | EDGAR |
| 2026-05-21 | Jon Panzer | Chief Financial Officer | Other (J) | −8,065 | $4.03 | -$32.5K | EDGAR |
| 2026-05-21 | JOSHUA T. MOOK | Chief Technology Officer | Other (J) | −6,803 | $4.02 | -$27.3K | EDGAR |
| 2026-05-21 | Thomas J. Healy | Chief Executive Officer | Other (J) | −28,026 | $4.04 | -$113.2K | EDGAR |
| 2026-05-21 | GOVINDARAJ RAMASAMY | Chief Commercial Officer | Other (J) | −6,515 | $4.02 | -$26.2K | EDGAR |
| # | Insider | Role | Shares | Disclosed Exposure | Lifetime OM Net | Filings | Last Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Thomas J. Healy | Chief Executive Officer | 32,782,422 | $137.85M | -$17.42M | 34 | 2026-08-25 |
| 2 | HOWARD M JENKINS | Director | 12,152,962 | $51.10M | -$7.10M | 6 | 2023-03-15 |
| 3 | Vincent T. Cubbage | Director | 1,131,363 | $4.76M | -$919.3K | 11 | 2026-08-27 |
| 4 | JOSHUA T. MOOK | Chief Technology Officer | 1,096,606 | $4.61M | $0 | 22 | 2026-08-21 |
| 5 | EDWARD E OLKKOLA | Director | 1,035,705 | $4.36M | -$3.72M | 10 | 2022-02-28 |
| 6 | Jon Panzer | Chief Financial Officer | 935,480 | $3.93M | $170.9K | 35 | 2026-08-21 |
| 7 | Jose Miguel Oxholm | Chief Legal&Compliance Officer | 749,814 | $3.15M | $41.2K | 46 | 2026-09-22 |
| 8 | CHERI LANTZ | Chief Strategy Officer | 730,204 | $3.07M | $13.2K | 29 | 2026-03-04 |
| 9 | GOVINDARAJ RAMASAMY | Chief Commercial Officer | 593,920 | $2.50M | $95.2K | 19 | 2026-08-21 |
| 10 | DENNIS M. GALLAGHER | Chief Operating Officer | 448,109 | $1.88M | $101.5K | 15 | 2024-02-29 |
What is Form 144? A notice of intent to sell restricted or control stock under Rule 144. Affiliates (officers, directors, 10%+ owners) and holders of restricted shares must file Form 144 when planning to sell more than 5,000 shares or $50,000 in any 3-month rolling window.
How it relates to Form 4: Form 144 is filed before the trade (up to 90 days in advance); Form 4 is filed within 2 business days after the trade executes. Not every Form 144 results in a sale — the filer may cancel or delay. Look for the corresponding Form 4 on the Insider Activity card to confirm a sale actually happened.
10b5-1 plans: Trades made under a pre-scheduled Rule 10b5-1 plan are not discretionary — they execute automatically on dates set months earlier, regardless of news. High 10b5-1 percentages mean less per-filing signal value, though cumulative selling volume still matters.
"Notice value": Aggregate market value the filer wrote into the Form 144 — i.e. the size of the planned sale, not necessarily the executed dollars. Amendments (Form 144/A) and post-cancellation refilings can inflate this if you sum naively; the rollup above excludes filings with zero stated value.
Source & freshness: Sourced from public Form 144 filings. Refreshed daily; new filings typically appear here the morning after they are filed.
| Filed | Filer | Role | Shares | Notice Value | Planned Sale | Broker | Plan | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-08-21 | Thomas Healy | Officer, Director | 60,000 | $200.0K | 2026-08-21 | UBS Financial Services Inc | — | EDGAR |
| 2026-08-21 | Jose Oxholm | Officer | 15,000 | $50.0K | 2026-08-21 | UBS Financial Services Inc | — | EDGAR |
| 2026-08-21 | Joshua Mook | Officer | 15,000 | $50.0K | 2026-08-21 | UBS Financial Services Inc | — | EDGAR |
| 2026-08-21 | Jon Panzer | Officer | 30,000 | $100.0K | 2026-08-21 | UBS Financial Services Inc | — | EDGAR |
| 2026-08-21 | Govindaraj Ramasamy | Officer | 7,000 | $22.5K | 2026-08-21 | UBS Financial Services Inc | — | EDGAR |
| 2026-05-19 | Thomas Healy | Officer | 30,000 | $125.0K | 2026-05-19 | UBS Financial Services Inc | — | EDGAR |
| 2026-05-19 | Joshua Mook | Officer | 15,000 | $61.0K | 2026-05-19 | UBS Financial Services Inc | — | EDGAR |
| 2026-05-19 | Jon Panzer | Officer | 15,000 | $61.0K | 2026-05-19 | UBS Financial Services Inc | — | EDGAR |
| 2026-05-19 | Govindaraj Ramasamy | Officer | 15,000 | $61.0K | 2026-05-19 | UBS Financial Services Inc | — | EDGAR |
| 2026-05-19 | Jose Oxholm | Officer | 15,000 | $61.0K | 2026-05-19 | UBS Financial Services Inc | — | EDGAR |
| # | ETF | Provider | Weight | $ Exposure | ETF AUM | As Of |
|---|
Quarterly filings sourced from SEC 10-Q / 10-K reports. TTM tiles aggregate the most recent four quarters; bars show the last ~12 quarters oldest → newest.
- Revenue — top-line sales. Look for consistent YoY growth; seasonal businesses need same-quarter comparisons (Q4 '24 vs Q4 '23).
- Net Income — bottom-line profit after all expenses. Can be volatile from one-time items; red bars = net loss.
- Diluted EPS — net income per share assuming options/converts are exercised. Direct input to the P/E ratio.
- Operating Cash Flow — cash generated from core operations, before capex and financing. Harder to manipulate than net income; growing OCF is a quality signal.
- Sequential growth — quarter-over-quarter trend. Accelerating bars are a momentum signal.
- YoY growth — compare to the same quarter a year earlier to remove seasonality.
- Quality — OCF should roughly track Net Income over time. Large divergence (net income ≫ OCF) flags accruals risk.
- Margins — scan the bar ratios: Net Income / Revenue tells you margin trend without needing a separate chart.
TTM (trailing-twelve-month) smooths seasonality and is used for the P/E calculation. Filings appear 30–90 days after the period closes.
| P/B Ratio | 4.4 |
| P/S Ratio | 80.0 |
| EV/EBITDA | -13.9 |
| TTM Revenue | $0.0B |
| TTM Net Income | $-0.1B |
| TTM EPS | $-0.31 |
| ROE | -30.8% |