Standex International Corporation(SXI)
Stock quote, options chain, IV rank, technicals, AI analysis, and institutional ownership.
Market data may be delayed, incomplete, or inaccurate. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Verify quotes with your broker before trading. See Terms §17.
Snapshot
$313.69
- 52-Week Range
- $151.79 – $318.00
- YTD
- +39.50%
- IV Rank (30D)
- 18.26
- Straddle Price
- $22.80
- P/C Vol Ratio
- 20.50
- Market Cap
- $3.6B
Fair Value
-22.4% vs price
A blended fair-value estimate combining up to six valuation methods. Each method is weighted by how well it fits the company — DCF down-weights for unprofitable names; DDM only fires for steady dividend payers; comparables down-weight when peer multiples disagree.
- DCF (quality-aware) — projects free cash flow with a horizon that scales to business quality. True compounders (quality 6/6) get 10 years explicit + 10 years fade before terminal; cyclical/struggling names (quality 0-1) get a 5-year terminal cliff. Quality is scored from ROE, gross margin, growth, FCF margin, debt load, and FCF consistency — the same factors that drive market premium for compounders.
- Market-Implied Growth (in Model Inputs) — reverse-DCF that answers "what growth rate is the market pricing in?". Lets you sanity-check the deviation: if implied growth is plausible for the business, the model's bearish flag may be wrong; if implausible, the market may be over-extrapolating.
- DDM (Gordon Growth Dividend Model) — values the stream of future dividends. Only used when trailing yield ≥ 0.5% and dividend payments are stable.
- P/E, EV/EBITDA, P/B, P/S — applies the peer-group median multiple to this company's per-share metric. Peers come from the same set as the "Related symbols" card. Earnings/sales metrics are forward-tilted by the company's recent revenue growth (capped at 25%) so they're comparable to peers' growth-embedded multiples — mimics how analysts use NTM rather than TTM. Per-multiple weights are biased by company quality (e.g. P/B down-weighted for asset-light tech).
- Market Anchor (SMA50) — the 50-day moving average, weighted by recent trading-range stability (tighter Bollinger bands → higher weight). Captures information fundamentals miss (forward consensus, sentiment, supply/demand) — but only when recent trading is steady enough that the market has converged on a view. During wild breakouts or breakdowns the anchor's weight collapses.
- Options Expected (B-L 30d) — the risk-neutral expected stock price at 30-day options expiration, derived from the full implied-volatility surface via Breeden-Litzenberger (second derivative of call price wrt strike → implied PDF, then E[S_T]). Forward-looking, captures all options-implied information (smile, skew, term structure) in one number. Weighted by chain liquidity. SP500-only at present (pre-computed daily). Backtest evidence: adds modest alpha across most bucket × holding combos.
- Blended value — weighted average. Confidence reflects how many methods fired and how tight peer dispersion is.
- Deviation pill — green when blended FV ≥ 10% above current price (undervalued); red when ≥ 10% below; grey otherwise.
| 10-yr Treasury (rf) | 4.47% |
| Beta vs SPY | 1.00 |
| Cost of Equity (CAPM) | 9.97% (VRP-adj) |
| WACC | 9.09% |
| Volatility Risk Premium | +15.1pp (IV − HV30), ERP adj +50bps |
| Effective Tax Rate | 23.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY, DCF input) | +1.1% |
| DCF Horizon | 5 years explicit + fade |
| Forward Tilt (NTM/TTM) | ×1.01 (applied to P/E, EV/EBITDA, P/S) |
| Free Cash Flow (TTM) | $0.1B |
| Return on Equity (TTM) | 13.1% |
| Book / Price | 21.2% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 41.3% |
| FCF Margin (TTM) | 6.1% |
| Debt / Equity | 0.63 |
| Quality Score | 1/6 — cyclical/struggling (5y DCF) |
| SMA 50 | $273.20 (Market Anchor value) |
| SMA 20 / Bollinger Mid | $285.58 |
| Bollinger Width / SMA20 | 8.4% (drives anchor stability) |
| Net Debt | $0.4B |
| Market Cap | $4B |
Peers used for multiples: BA, DCO, HON, LMT, MOG.A, RDW, RKLB, VOYG
Blended Fair Value
$242.65
Current Price
$312.73
Deviation
-22.4%
Forward-Return Rank
SHORT
gated
?
| Horizon | Expected α | z Pred | Blended z | Rank % | Active? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 21d | -2.1% | +0.23 | -0.79 | 35.4% | — |
| 42d | -3.8% | +0.14 | -0.79 | 35.4% | — |
| 63d | -6.2% | -0.18 | -0.79 | 35.4% | — |
Expected α = forward-return point estimate vs SPY (e.g., +7.5% means the predictor expects this stock to outperform SPY by 7.5% over that horizon).
For SHORT direction the model uses a different ranking metric (conviction-weighted deviation, not the LGBM prediction); Expected α is shown for reference.
⚠ flags rows where Expected α disagrees with the FV direction — two independent signals are in conflict; conviction is low even if rank looks extreme.
Forward-Return Rank. A proprietary ensemble of a machine-learning forward-return model and a conviction-weighted fundamental score, ranked cross-sectionally each day across the S&P 500 (and broader universes on the screener). Each stock is scored at three horizons (21/42/63 trading days). "Active" = top/bottom 5% AND all risk filters pass. Backtested mean alpha vs SPY on active picks: 21d LONG +13.4%, 63d +34.9% (S&P 500, walk-forward). Past performance is not indicative of future results.
Value vs momentum conflict ⚠. The "FV direction" (long/short) comes from the fundamentals-based engine — price vs intrinsic value. The "Expected α" comes from a separate machine-learning predictor trained on ~12 features (sector, options-implied move, beta, institutional flow, etc.). Sometimes the two disagree: a stock is overvalued by fundamentals but the predictor expects it to keep outperforming (sector or momentum tailwinds). When all 3 horizons disagree, treat the direction signal as low-conviction — neither model is strongly recommending a position.
| Method | Implied Price | Weight | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| DCF | $35.46 | 24% | |
| DDM (Gordon) | n/a | 0% | |
| Peer P/E | $330.85 | 7% | median 39.9× · 4 peers |
| Peer EV/EBITDA | $334.46 | 7% | median 22.9× · 4 peers |
| Peer P/B | $531.59 | 7% | median 8.5× · 8 peers |
| Peer P/S | $260.60 | 7% | median 3.5× · 8 peers |
| Market Anchor (SMA50) | $273.20 | 48% | stability 100% (BB-width) |
| Options Expected (B-L 30d) | n/a | 0% |
As of 2026-06-18 · updated 2026-06-18 18:17:30.731000
Info
- Industry (SIC)
- REFRIGERATION & SERVICE INDUSTRY MACHINERY (3580)
- Exchange
- XNYS
- Market Cap
- $3.6B
Standex International Corp is an industrial manufacturer of different products and services used in commercial and industrial markets. The company has five reportable segments: Electronics, Engraving, Scientific, Engineering Technologies, and Specialty Solutions. The maximum revenue is generated from its Electronics segment, which is a component and value-added services provider of both sensing and switching technologies, as well as magnetic power conversion components and assemblies, like custom wound transformers and inductors, current sense technology, value-added assemblies, and mechanical…
Chart
Seasonality
| Month | Avg Return | Years of Data |
|---|---|---|
| Jan | -0.02% | 6 |
| Feb | +6.49% | 6 |
| Mar | -1.29% | 6 |
| Apr | -2.21% | 6 |
| May | +3.30% | 6 |
| Jun | +1.06% | 6 |
| Jul | +6.85% | 5 |
| Aug | -0.63% | 5 |
| Sep | -0.85% | 5 |
| Oct | +8.12% | 5 |
| Nov | +1.20% | 5 |
| Dec | +0.26% | 5 |
Technical Indicators
Quick-reference for reading the values below. Indicators combine to confirm a view — no single one is a trade signal on its own.
Trend Indicators
- SMA 20 / 50 / 200 — price above = uptrend, below = downtrend. SMA 50 crossing SMA 200 is the golden/death cross.
- EMA 12 / 26 — faster-reacting averages; 12 above 26 is short-term bullish.
- MACD — bullish when MACD > signal (green badge), bearish when below. Divergence from price often precedes reversals.
- ADX (14) — trend strength regardless of direction. <20 range, 20–25 weak trend, 25–50 trend, >50 strong trend.
- +DI / −DI — +DI > −DI favors bulls; the reverse favors bears. Read alongside ADX.
Momentum Oscillators
- RSI (14) — <30 oversold, >70 overbought. 40–60 is neutral; trending names can stay extreme.
- Stochastic %K / %D — <20 oversold, >80 overbought. %K crossing %D is an early momentum signal.
- Williams %R — inverted scale: <−80 oversold, >−20 overbought.
Oscillators work best in range-bound markets; in strong trends they give premature reversal signals.
Volume & Volatility
- Bollinger Bands — price at upper band = overbought, lower = oversold. Narrow bands (squeeze) often precede expansion.
- OBV — cumulative volume; rising OBV confirms uptrend, falling OBV confirms downtrend. Divergence from price is a warning.
- Vol SMA 20 / Vol ROC — today's volume vs. 20-day average. Positive ROC with price move = conviction.
- ATR / True Range — average daily $ move; sizing and stop-loss reference.
- HV 20 / 30 / 60 — realized (historical) volatility. Compare to IV on the options cards: IV > HV = rich premium.
Confluence matters: trend + momentum + volume agreeing carries far more weight than any single indicator. For how these feed the spread scanner score, see the algorithm docs →
Trend Indicators
SMA 20: $288.52
SMA 50: $274.00
SMA 200: $246.28
Current: $312.77
EMA 12: $298.22
EMA 26: $287.04
MACD: 11.1790 | Signal: 1.5140
BULLISH
ADX (14): 22.41
WEAK TREND
+DI: 23.70
−DI: 15.83
Momentum Oscillators
RSI (14): 66.01
NEUTRAL
Stoch %K: 74.77
Stoch %D: 78.34
Williams %R: -10.99
Volume & Volatility
BB Upper: $321.27
BB Lower: $255.77
NEUTRAL
OBV: 1,271,821
Vol SMA 20: 174,324
Vol ROC: -19.80%
ATR: $12.10
True Range: $21.14
HV 20: 38.1%
HV 30: 39.3%
HV 60: 45.2%
Data Summary
Data Points: 500
Last Updated: 2026-06-18T18:15:23.013000
Date Range: 2024-06-20T00:00:00 – 2026-06-17T00:00:00
AI Analysis
Choose Frenzy-Fast™ for quick analysis or Frenzy-Pro™ for comprehensive analysis.
Analysis includes technical indicators, news sentiment, risk assessment, and specific price levels to watch.
News
Earnings History
6 of 8 under expected move
| Earnings Date | Timing | Expected Move | Actual Move | Ratio | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-08-02 | Pre-Market | 5.82% | 1.35% | 0.23x | Within |
| 2024-10-29 | Pre-Market | 6.33% | 1.44% | 0.23x | Within |
| 2025-01-31 | Pre-Market | 6.15% | 2.07% | 0.34x | Within |
| 2025-05-02 | Pre-Market | 6.58% | 10.05% | 1.53x | Exceeded |
| 2025-08-05 | Pre-Market | 3.23% | 3.64% | 1.13x | Exceeded |
| 2025-10-31 | Pre-Market | 6.95% | 2.30% | 0.33x | Within |
| 2026-02-04 | Pre-Market | 5.22% | 0.89% | 0.17x | Within |
| 2026-05-05 | Pre-Market | 5.63% | 2.87% | 0.51x | Within |
Options Activity
- IV Rank (30D)
- 18.26
- IV Rank (7D)
- 100
- Avg IV
- 58.6%
- Straddle (30D)
- $22.80
- Straddle (7D)
- $6.93
- P/C Volume
- 20.50
Spread Scanner GPU
Each spread is ranked by a composite score built in three stages. Full documentation →
Stage 1 — Base Score (GPU scanner)
score = P(profit) × (credit / spread_width)
P(profit) from short leg delta (1 − |delta|), penalised above 85%. Credit uses mid-price to handle illiquid chains fairly.
Stage 2 — Skew Adjustment (±25% cap)
RR and BF (30-delta) from the persisted per-symbol skew snapshot — wing strikes picked by real greeks.delta, not a moneyness proxy. Put skew boosts bull puts, penalises bear calls. High butterfly boosts iron condors. Calendars are skew-neutral.
Stage 3 — Technical Overlay (±50% cap, 5 groups)
Group 1 · Directional Bias (±0.25)
- RSI <40 bullish / >60 bearish
- MACD crossover + histogram trend
- Price vs SMA 50 & SMA 200
Group 2 · Momentum (±0.10)
- Stochastic %K <20 / >80
- Williams %R <−80 / >−20
Group 3 · Volatility (up to −0.25 / +0.15)
- Blended ATR + straddle expected-move penalty
- Bollinger Band signal (+ counter-trend penalty)
- BB width — vol contraction boost for ICs
Group 4 · IV Regime (±0.15)
- IV rank ≥ 75 → strong boost for credit spreads
- IV rank < 25 → penalty (selling cheap vol)
Group 5 · Liquidity (penalty up to −0.10)
- Min open interest across all legs
- OI < 100 → −0.10 · OI < 500 → −0.05
score = base_score × skew_multiplier × tech_multiplier
Both multipliers are shown per spread. Beta is informational only — ATR already captures realized vol. Full algorithm documentation →
Enter a ticker to scan for optimal spread opportunities.
Evaluates all bull put, bear call, iron condor, and calendar spread combinations using GPU-accelerated analysis.
Skew (Wing IV − ATM IV)
DTE:
Wing Δ:
Wing vs ATM
IV(put wing) − IV(ATM), in vol pointsHow much the OTM put trades above (or below) the at-the-money strike. Measures the height of the put-side tail relative to ATM — i.e. how expensive crash insurance is on this name.
- Positive (typical) — wing IV > ATM IV. Standard equity put skew: portfolios bid up crash protection, so OTM puts trade richer than ATM.
- Near zero or negative (unusual) — wing IV ≤ ATM IV. Flat or inverted put side. Common when there's no fear demand, in tightly mean-reverting names, or right after an earnings catalyst clears.
- Percentile vs own 3-yr history: high = wings rich (good time to sell wing premium); low = wings cheap (good time to buy protection).
- Not directional — high or low wings don't predict up or down moves. It's a price tag on tail insurance, not a forecast.
Risk Reversal
IV(call wing) − IV(put wing), equal delta on each sideWhich side of the smile is the market paying up for? Measures the tilt of the surface — call skew vs put skew at matched deltas.
- Negative (typical) — puts richer than calls. Standard equity behavior: hedging demand makes puts carry a premium. Most large-caps sit in the −1 to −5 vol-point range.
- Strongly negative (< −5 pts) — heavy downside hedging, elevated fear, or an upcoming catalyst (earnings, FDA, macro event). Worth flagging.
- Positive — calls richer than puts. Unusual for equities; signals bullish momentum, short-squeeze positioning, or takeover/M&A speculation.
- Near zero — symmetric surface. Market sees roughly equal up/down risk. Rare for large-caps; more common in commodities and FX.
Reading them together
Wing-vs-ATM tells you how expensive the tails are. Risk Reversal tells you which side is favored. Combined:
- High wing percentile + deeply negative RR → strong put bid; stress or major event priced in. Owning protection costs a premium; selling put premium is dangerous.
- Low wing percentile + near-zero RR → complacency; insurance cheap and balanced. Good environment to add cheap downside hedges.
- Positive RR + elevated wings → call-side fear-of-missing-out; common in squeeze setups. Upside calls expensive, downside puts not bid.
14 DTE / 10d
—
—
pts
EXTREME
ATM — / Wing —
30 DTE / 10d
—
—
pts
EXTREME
ATM — / Wing —
Extreme reading.
Historically these have been contrarian — on the small set of observed earnings-day cases, large negative wing-vs-ATM gaps (calls pricing much richer than puts at the same delta) preceded sharp drops in the underlying within 1-12 days. Not financial advice and the dataset is small.
Percentile is the rank of today's reading within ~3 years of this symbol's own history. High percentile = wings are rich relative to history; not a directional signal. Skew is read off the chain in real time, not from CBOE SKEW.
Volatility Surface
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility surface.
IV Rank (7 DTE)
IV Rank (30 DTE)
Straddle Price (30 DTE)
Beta Analysis
- Beta (1Y vs SPY)
- 1.48
- Correlation (SPY)
- 48.9%
- R²
- 0.24
- Ann. Volatility
- 37.6%
- SPY Volatility
- 12.4%
High volatility - stock moves more than market
Beta & Alpha Over Time
Institutional Ownership (13F)
Latest filings — 2026-03-31
? 13F Guide
Diluted shares outstanding: 12,045,000 (as of 2026-03-31)
Institutional managers with $100M+ AUM file Form 13F-HR quarterly, due 45 days after quarter end. Holdings are reported gross at quarter-end market value — they are a snapshot, not a real-time position.
- Shares — long equity positions in this name, aggregated across share classes.
- Calls / Puts — notional value of long call / put exposure where this ticker is the underlying.
- % of Float — holder's reported shares divided by the latest diluted shares outstanding. Sums above 100% indicate large custodian / prime broker positions where the same shares are reported by multiple filers.
- Custodian badge — filers with more than 5,000 holdings are typically broker-dealers / custodians reporting customer-held shares, not active managers.
Each filer is counted once at its latest 13F-HR filing. New filings are ingested on a weekly cadence.
3 filers$1.78M notional
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | D. E. Shaw & Co., Inc. Custodian | $892.01K | 50.00% | 2026-03-31 |
| 2 | SUSQUEHANNA INTERNATIONAL GROUP, LLP Custodian | $611.66K | 34.29% | 2026-03-31 |
| 3 | CITADEL ADVISORS LLC Custodian | $280.35K | 15.71% | 2026-03-31 |
5 filers$3.10M notional
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | SUSQUEHANNA INTERNATIONAL GROUP, LLP Custodian | $1.40M | 45.20% | 2026-03-31 |
| 2 | D. E. Shaw & Co., Inc. Custodian | $815.55K | 26.30% | 2026-03-31 |
| 3 | JANE STREET GROUP, LLC Custodian | $586.18K | 18.90% | 2026-03-31 |
| 4 | CITADEL ADVISORS LLC Custodian | $280.35K | 9.04% | 2026-03-31 |
| 5 | FIFTH THIRD BANCORP | $17.60K | 0.57% | 2026-03-31 |
Insider Activity
Latest: 2026-06-03
Form 4 filings — insider beneficial-ownership changes by officers, directors, and 10%+ holders. Filed within 2 business days of transaction.
| Filed | Reporter | Role | Action | Shares | Avg Price | Net $ | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-06-03 | THOMAS E CHORMAN | Director | Sell (S) | −50 | $272.82 | -$13.6K | EDGAR |
| 2026-05-28 | Barbara Joanne Edwards | Director | Sell (S) | −558 | $274.81 | -$153.3K | EDGAR |
| 2026-05-19 | Danielle Rangel | VP & Chief Accounting Officer | Grant (A) | +603 RSU | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-05-04 | THOMAS E CHORMAN | Director | Sell (S) | −50 | $268.43 | -$13.4K | EDGAR |
| 2026-04-10 | Max Arets | VP; Chief Information Officer | Tax (F) | −132 | $272.83 | -$36.0K | EDGAR |
| 2026-04-06 | ALAN J GLASS | CLO, VP & Secretary | Tax (F) | −204 | $257.70 | -$52.6K | EDGAR |
| 2026-04-03 | THOMAS E CHORMAN | Director | Sell (S) | −50 | $257.94 | -$12.9K | EDGAR |
| 2026-04-03 | Ademir Sarcevic | Vice President/CFO/Treasurer | Tax (F) | −1,713 | $260.09 | -$445.5K | EDGAR |
| 2026-03-03 | THOMAS E CHORMAN | Director | Sell (S) | −50 | $259.00 | -$12.9K | EDGAR |
| 2026-03-02 | THOMAS E CHORMAN | Director | Sell (S) | −513 | $260.00 | -$133.4K | EDGAR |
| 2026-02-24 | Barbara Joanne Edwards | Director | Gift (G) | −58 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-02-20 | Vineet Kshirsagar | Chief Strategy Officer | Sell (S) | −400 | $260.10 | -$104.0K | EDGAR |
| 2026-02-20 | CHARLES H JR CANNON | Director | Sell (S) | −2,000 | $256.64 | -$513.3K | EDGAR |
| 2026-02-18 | David A. Dunbar | President/CEO/Chairman | Sell (S) | −15,000 | $255.94 | -$3.84M | EDGAR |
| 2026-02-05 | THOMAS E CHORMAN | Director | Sell (S) | −50 | $249.86 | -$12.5K | EDGAR |
Codes: P = open-market purchase · S = open-market sale · A = grant/award · M = option exercise · F = tax withholding at vest · G = bona-fide gift · D = disposition to issuer · J = other (described in filing footnote — typically 401(k), trust, inheritance) · W = will/inheritance. Only P / S codes carry directional signal.
Insider Holdings
36 insiders · @ $312.77
Officers, directors, and 10%+ owners ranked by current disclosed exposure (shares × today's price). Shares are direct + indirect (via trusts / LLCs / spouse). Excludes unvested RSU and option grants — those aren't beneficially owned until vest.
| # | Insider | Role | Shares | Disclosed Exposure | Lifetime OM Net | Filings | Last Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | David A. Dunbar | President/CEO/Chairman | 95,402 | $29.84M | -$22.64M | 58 | 2026-02-18 |
| 2 | Thomas D. DeByle | Vice President/CFO | 68,627 | $21.46M | -$1.68M | 100 | 2019-09-24 |
| 3 | DEBORAH A ROSEN | Vice President/Secretary | 38,971 | $12.19M | -$1.11M | 52 | 2016-04-18 |
| 4 | CHRISTIAN STORCH | Vice President/CFO | 30,024 | $9.39M | -$24.4K | 10 | 2007-11-15 |
| 5 | Abbott John | 27,587 | $8.63M | -$3.48M | 71 | 2014-11-18 | |
| 6 | ALAN J GLASS | CLO, VP & Secretary | 22,722 | $7.11M | -$564.3K | 28 | 2026-04-06 |
| 7 | DANIEL B HOGAN | Director | 20,135 | $6.30M | -$563.1K | 38 | 2020-10-21 |
| 8 | CHARLES H JR CANNON | Director | 15,326 | $4.79M | -$6.08M | 59 | 2026-02-20 |
| 9 | Jeffrey S Edwards | Director | 14,424 | $4.51M | $0 | 19 | 2025-10-22 |
| 10 | Paul C. Burns | Vice Pres. Strategy & Business | 13,992 | $4.38M | -$1.30M | 25 | 2023-02-07 |
Lifetime OM Net = signed sum of open-market buys (P) and sells (S) over their career; excludes grants, tax withholdings, and dispositions to issuer. A large negative number is normal for long-tenured executives — they've sold compensation grants over many years.
ETF Holders
| # | ETF | Provider | Weight | $ Exposure | ETF AUM | As Of |
|---|
Fundamentals
Quarterly filings sourced from SEC 10-Q / 10-K reports. TTM tiles aggregate the most recent four quarters; bars show the last ~12 quarters oldest → newest.
Metrics
- Revenue — top-line sales. Look for consistent YoY growth; seasonal businesses need same-quarter comparisons (Q4 '24 vs Q4 '23).
- Net Income — bottom-line profit after all expenses. Can be volatile from one-time items; red bars = net loss.
- Diluted EPS — net income per share assuming options/converts are exercised. Direct input to the P/E ratio.
- Operating Cash Flow — cash generated from core operations, before capex and financing. Harder to manipulate than net income; growing OCF is a quality signal.
How to read the bars
- Sequential growth — quarter-over-quarter trend. Accelerating bars are a momentum signal.
- YoY growth — compare to the same quarter a year earlier to remove seasonality.
- Quality — OCF should roughly track Net Income over time. Large divergence (net income ≫ OCF) flags accruals risk.
- Margins — scan the bar ratios: Net Income / Revenue tells you margin trend without needing a separate chart.
TTM (trailing-twelve-month) smooths seasonality and is used for the P/E calculation. Filings appear 30–90 days after the period closes.
| P/E Ratio | 38.3 |
| P/B Ratio | 5.0 |
| P/S Ratio | 4.2 |
| EV/EBITDA | 21.7 |
| TTM Revenue | $0.9B |
| TTM Net Income | $0.1B |
| TTM EPS | $8.2 |
| ROE | 13.1% |
| Dividend Yield | 0.49% |
| Debt/Equity | 0.63 |