AOA vs GUG

iShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF against Guggenheim Active Allocation Fund: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Fee gap
—
same fee
1-year return gap
21.3 pts
AOA is ahead
Larger fund
AOA
$3.3B

Side by side

AOAGUG
FundiShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETFGuggenheim Active Allocation Fund
IssueriSharesGuggenheim
CategoryAllocationAllocation
Expense ratio0.15%—
Assets$3.3B$456M
Average daily dollar volume$18M$1.8M
ListedNov 4, 2008Nov 24, 2021
FrenzyCap score6951
1-month return−1.7%−0.7%
3-month return+0.8%−10.1%
Year to date+8.0%−9.8%
1-year return+8.8%−12.5%
30-day volatility8.6%17.9%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−8.2%−16.6%
Trailing 12-month yield2.18%—
Holdings9—
Top 10 weight99.9%—
Look-through P/E——
Holdings vs fair value——
Holdings above 200-day average——
Net flow, latest 3 reported months+$77M thru Jul 2026—
30-day implied volatility11.5%—
Holdings as ofas of Oct 23, 2026issuer data

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

More: full overlap table · AOA holdings · GUG holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.