AOA vs ITDG

iShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF against iShares LifePath Target Date 2055 ETF: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Overlap by weight
31%
2 shared positions
Fee gap
3 bp
ITDG is cheaper
1-year return gap
3.5 pts
ITDG is ahead
Larger fund
AOA
$3.3B

Side by side

AOAITDG
FundiShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETFiShares LifePath Target Date 2055 ETF
IssueriSharesiShares
CategoryAllocationTarget Date
Expense ratio0.15%0.12%
Assets$3.3B$69M
Average daily dollar volume$16M$381K
ListedNov 4, 2008Oct 17, 2023
FrenzyCap score6944
1-month return−1.9%−2.0%
3-month return+0.6%+1.0%
Year to date+8.5%+12.6%
1-year return+10.4%+13.9%
30-day volatility8.6%11.2%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−8.2%−9.5%
Trailing 12-month yield2.17%1.43%
Holdings98
Top 10 weight99.9%99.8%
Look-through P/E——
Holdings vs fair value——
Holdings above 200-day average——
Net flow, latest 3 reported months+$77M thru Jul 2026+$5.9M thru Jul 2026
30-day implied volatility10.4%—
Holdings as ofas of Oct 19, 2026issuer dataas of Oct 19, 2026issuer data

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

Largest shared holdings

31% of AOA · 36% of ITDG
HoldingAOAITDG
IDEV22.38%24.74%
IEMG8.47%11.25%

Sector mix of the stock holdings

No sector breakdown: these funds hold few classified stocks.

More: full overlap table · AOA holdings · ITDG holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.