BALT vs DRSK

Innovator Defined Wealth Shield ETF against Aptus Defined Risk ETF: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Fee gap
9 bp
BALT is cheaper
1-year return gap
14.2 pts
BALT is ahead
Larger fund
BALT
$3.2B

Side by side

BALTDRSK
FundInnovator Defined Wealth Shield ETFAptus Defined Risk ETF
IssuerInnovatorAptus
CategoryBufferBuffer
Expense ratio0.69%0.78%
Assets$3.2B$1.4B
Average daily dollar volume$23M$5.0M
ListedJun 30, 2021Aug 7, 2018
FrenzyCap score6254
1-month return+0.3%−3.0%
3-month return+2.4%−3.8%
Year to date+4.7%−4.7%
1-year return+6.7%−7.6%
30-day volatility3.1%7.2%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−1.1%−8.8%
Trailing 12-month yield—4.04%
Holdings634
Top 10 weight102.2%94.3%
Look-through P/E——
Holdings vs fair value——
Holdings above 200-day average——
Net flow, latest 3 reported months+$317M thru Jul 2026+$42M thru Jul 2026
30-day implied volatility15.5%32.2%
Holdings as ofas of Oct 21, 2026issuer dataas of Jul 31, 2026SEC filing

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

More: full overlap table · BALT holdings · DRSK holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.